Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751010AbWKBXZK (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:25:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752789AbWKBXZK (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:25:10 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:44723 "EHLO hera.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbWKBXZI (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:25:08 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Can Linux live without DMA zone? Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 15:24:33 -0800 Organization: OSDL Message-ID: <20061102152433.1c01faad@freekitty> References: <20061102021547.GA1240@srv.junsun.net> <454A1D82.7040709@cfl.rr.com> <1162486642.14530.64.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <454A4237.90106@cfl.rr.com> <1162498205.14530.83.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <454A627C.1090104@cfl.rr.com> <1162505945.14530.98.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061102231715.GA10902@srv.junsun.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: build.pdx.osdl.net 1162509875 20564 10.8.0.54 (2 Nov 2006 23:24:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@osdl.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:24:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.0-rc3 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2157 Lines: 49 On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 15:17:15 -0800 Jun Sun wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:19:05PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:26 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > > > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > that's for the 32 bit boundary. THe problem is that there are 31, 30, 28 > > > > and 26 bit devices as well, and those are in more trouble, and will > > > > eventually fall back to GFP_DMA (inside the x86 PCI code; the driver > > > > just uses the pci dma allocation routines) if they can't get suitable > > > > memory otherwise.... > > > > > > > > It's all nice in theory. But then there is the reality that not all > > > > devices are nice pci device that implement the entire spec;) > > > > > > > > > > Right, but doesn't the bounce/allocation routine take as a parameter the > > > limit that the device can handle? If the device can handle 28 bit > > > addresses, then the kernel should not limit it to only 24 bits. > > > > you're right in theory, but the kernel only has a few pools of memory > > available, but not at every bit boundary. there is a 32 bit pool > > (GFP_DMA32) on some, a 30-ish bit pool (GFP_KERNEL) on others, and a 24 > > bit pool (GFP_DMA) with basically nothing inbetween. > > > > Perhaps a better solution is to > > 1. get rid of DMA zone > > 2. have another alloc funciton (e.g., kmalloc_range()) which takes an > extra pair of parameters to indicate the desired range for the > allocated memory. Most DMA buffers are allocated during start-up. > So the alloc operations should generally be successful. > Network devices don't allocate buffer until they are brought up. By then a lot of memory allocation has happened. You could add an interface that allows a device to say: kmalloc_range_intent(unsigned long mask, unsigned count, unsigned size) to cause reservation before use. -- Stephen Hemminger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/