Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp851338pxj; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:03:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJ+d2AdA6t0tauaynhIxaH6BBztY1HKGJumollUf0A+x1ya4r8cnEKIZgzZHBl1KQiJr7K X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2a8c:: with SMTP id fl12mr2619354ejc.160.1622786601252; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 23:03:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622786601; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LTuOwYj6GuoMgx44jQMmhOclJ4YI8hA8nlJ86dLYNZ9qfX47gpxbRW8023F1yZT7i8 6MLf3y0kbeMPe8R+4PZeQNQIimaust9yTIVnbgDUeYerSVoTUiYRuAzWwfFlop+wuVs6 tdb9MxWrmeAn5XJmVkaXtw4hx1OTsEV8xNC+YtPINf2VcMappaxD9iK9LuKi8vS8Ta6f JLnVMm4nYTLOGP9ohuHY0yhYCRtnknBl2rk9SngPePdx8p/aDHZQhZ2qANppCyhUxz7l FppV9sdQsJCMAZ1lHAzHgQ/w2K2RLZbksKX2SrUERJeRuf0SrGZAZMNH8CMxu3gyWU35 W2OQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=IepL4STzv+bRHR/ws0I4OMBLiTx2pbylGuF5n2ofQIg=; b=Z+w84m3CEUP8xzrh24WxHvR0LMW7AULNovwI0szlmb9Ej342A0zk4Ti4qMsmMJj0t6 MVgZXtFeaPXAeo+40m4TEgbK2tVZNtqhwyWkh+XCS7gYoMv/hUiRXS8+S3KpgLl6j00i 3CDZEniTvsljxrHg/qCcVrFcrqlXsbkJkDDGXZtxxwr567h+eSF0r/LAW/J/Rzy88mET cmntBl6jBNWCHGYTTcCzfeOpGp3AXOfRCXj8yA5yfgBTzp6/azIEmCy+KWtsrrJhcMeK RC621PIwwNwL9cu0bVfFT+rRQ946Osb7RCfqU9kuP/l0g+YLghQ9wihP48hGY73Fn2j5 lMbw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ingics-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=WTT9Szg4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jz16si4279622ejb.168.2021.06.03.23.02.58; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 23:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ingics-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=WTT9Szg4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229929AbhFDGCp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:02:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:39600 "EHLO mail-ej1-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229913AbhFDGCo (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:02:44 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id l1so12707656ejb.6 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 23:00:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingics-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IepL4STzv+bRHR/ws0I4OMBLiTx2pbylGuF5n2ofQIg=; b=WTT9Szg46u5n3cH8R8wY0HzIIQvp2XwnJn9CBBFLtMcaE/af2l0Zi234eliO4voAo1 fNOzV5jTlDS3TD+uHbWnzYWNNMEcD8NNra/BS7XYtkehmy7014xuroip+lDtHJTGkVKE o+KbYB0I3UsJjBsgIeneYDZsRT+E7LlSCHppRNtK2lAaMzAlU9DFIe0EKgZzFDagURFv TMxN7bXd2hBJqqBTfsYC7SpxCIyaqgB+nFhwNOPG/ZDiZgDuYFQZM4B1Vix6C0unI/kH TeOTHWY84SnCe0xyfRe5/ZMP7IuVmtwil0MU0jAY5tQAe2KBhUd1Zi1UHmtNCIOpLRYo feNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IepL4STzv+bRHR/ws0I4OMBLiTx2pbylGuF5n2ofQIg=; b=HuTUTGtgi6Q5QoGPUnORP29b8pJLpwwNwYaBekOsTIJxtmz/5g79gGfrRZr0RSUZCL PEx1w5F1yCOsJczRYDp3NI2bSV9QbCQJmNTkC7UNghTwcX7N4fyOxWF27/DUtY2lmg7v YDHRoUz7C0Fk7cHMn/Gnm4SvG9s6qRTWgsTU4ABlQMwNf22mAhUtWgZTsAD4laU2G0Ft GvRHDpNhxbzJzk9hAyDQKH1j9e4Da9oAW4iBWdlik83da+Ie9+BtXhxyiHVH0h5HIhmc p4qEKEyMa//caIa+/MM7L3UkPCwrNHDfgxWv8/+NrGsNv3AYR1ze+D3W54q6Zmrv8w4c cODw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UoSyhVI2cU9Es2pgvay14MsvW41ovMs0gh0eXqwtIzpXKZRLM ETlJe7g6bn/8YqVqYd/XuGT6Kufq3P9nXp3XoAxc8A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a017:: with SMTP id p23mr2690273ejy.460.1622786383374; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 22:59:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210603093809.1108629-1-axel.lin@ingics.com> <1622715641.1034.5.camel@richtek.com> <1622716902.1034.15.camel@richtek.com> <1622733524.3635.10.camel@richtek.com> <1622773474.9011.14.camel@richtek.com> <1622785727.9011.17.camel@richtek.com> In-Reply-To: <1622785727.9011.17.camel@richtek.com> From: Axel Lin Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:59:07 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rt6160: Convert to use regulator_set_ramp_delay_regmap To: =?UTF-8?B?Y3lfaHVhbmco6buD5ZWf5Y6fKQ==?= Cc: "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "u0084500@gmail.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cy_huang(=E9=BB=83=E5=95=9F=E5=8E=9F) =E6=96=BC 2021= =E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=884=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=94 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=881:48=E5= =AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > =E6=96=BC =E4=BA=94=EF=BC=8C2021-06-04 =E6=96=BC 11:30 +0800=EF=BC=8CAxel= Lin =E6=8F=90=E5=88=B0=EF=BC=9A > > cy_huang(=E9=BB=83=E5=95=9F=E5=8E=9F) =E6=96=BC 20= 21=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=884=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=94 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=8810:26= =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > cy_huang(=E9=BB=83=E5=95=9F=E5=8E=9F) =E6=96=BC 20= 21=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=883=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8811:18= =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > Hi,> > > > > cy_huang(=E9=BB=83=E5=95=9F=E5=8E=9F) =E6=96=BC 20= 21=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=883=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=886:20= =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > Hi, Axel:> Use regulator_set_ramp_delay_regmap instead of open-coded. > > > > > > There's some reason. > You can refer to https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/1/1145. > > It's because our ramp value order is from small to large, not large to > small. > It conflicts with find_closest_bigger value chosen logic. > > I have verified the rt6160_set_ramp_delay() behavior exactly the same as > regulator_set_ramp_delay_regmap. (both functions get the same selector > for a given delay) > > Could you check if this patch works? > > Sure. > > After my test sample code, below's the result. > ascending [1000 2500 5000 10000] > target =3D 1000 =3D>sel =3D 0 > target =3D 2500 =3D>sel =3D 1 > target =3D 5000 =3D>sel =3D 2 > target =3D 10000 =3D>sel =3D 3 > target =3D 1700 =3D>sel =3D 1 > target =3D 2750 =3D>sel =3D 2 > target =3D 7500 =3D>sel =3D 3 > target =3D 15000 =3D>failed to find best select, sel =3D 3 > target =3D 0 =3D>sel =3D 0 > descending [10000 5000 2500 1000] > target =3D 1000 =3D>sel =3D 3 > target =3D 2500 =3D>sel =3D 2 > target =3D 5000 =3D>sel =3D 1 > target =3D 10000 =3D>sel =3D 0 > target =3D 1700 =3D>sel =3D 2 > target =3D 2750 =3D>sel =3D 1 > target =3D 7500 =3D>sel =3D 0 > target =3D 15000 =3D>failed to find best select, sel =3D 0 > target =3D 0 =3D>sel =3D 3 > > > It means when target is in range or even over, the result are all correct= . > But like as the ramp target is equal to 0, the selection will only choose= the minimum one. > When the ramp target is equal to 0, it means the user want to disable the= rammpping function. > > As I know, if target is equal to 0, it must find the fastest rampping val= ue as the best selection. > > > If your table is [1000 2500 5000 10000], find_closest_bigger() will > choose sel=3D0 when ramp_delay=3D0. > If your table is [10000 5000 2500 1000], find_closest_bigger() will > choose sel=3D3 when ramp_delay=3D0. > i.e. In both cases, find_closest_bigger() chooses the fastest ramping val= ue. > > This meets your exception. > > Actually, even if your table is [10000, 1000, 5000, 2500], > find_closest_bigger() still can choose the correct selector. > i.e. sel=3D1 when ramp_delay=3D0 in this case. > > This selection may be wrong. > ramp_delay=3D0 means ramp disabled, > If chip not support rampping disable, this selection must be configured a= s fastest rampping value, not the minimum one. > > > 0 does not mean ramp disable. > It could be explicitly set to zero or its unintialized (zero by default). > see > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit= /drivers/regulator/core.c?id=3D1653ccf4c52df6a4abe8ec2f33f2cb2896d129ea > > How about 'ramp_disable' falg is true? My understanding is: If the h/w does not support disabling ramp_delay, the regulator core won't call ops->set_ramp_delay when ramp_delay=3D0. If the h/w supports disabling ramp, i.e. ramp_disable flag is true, the regulator core will call ops->set_ramp_delay with ramp_delay=3D0. in this case, it should have an exactly match and write the register to disable ramp_delay.