Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp940426pxj; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 01:56:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiv1WUoMlR2kg9iClYDMgwpEwbvtnK3CU9c3FDdKtwps9MiWN4FByrxTkBBH2/z81g2rP3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c20:: with SMTP id nc32mr3175318ejc.21.1622797006552; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 01:56:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622797006; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SphtMyCseHFZ7Z8V61FMu4YCGm+vg75U0UMyRS1ghqb+VrZUG+nZEdXM/yzGETv4C+ vHPeIsSeciXWjtkRvIWZGQu9Ciwy0HMbrlbdnI0ob+P3z33fslZUztDP+LOH+4qwRbqg WgExN/thRh4kWRamc0Jm6beccwMmm3tG2gut8XkwnyA2YDnDa+jH5gFMknkvgjV4B419 ppGrVPdq03iLLOC7U7Yzk5xCXRpcgbRxn8rYyEIpXx0GnxUn9r0VUIuhdWPoKDqv1fWV LT83943gX/kmT6EhUFc2z8G8upt71ArowjjOC9iSMkf5FV7s24pGF9HcCmBSJtW6FL/T OcuQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=rh6mj4lrmYdNKJNYcAYI3H1BGLQDM5tWOBORIf3kTRw=; b=mh57x0CEq+5iE8Isnpp4JqG5we8WyvVgvwHpTpGa+4nZiaDDXe6xwbC/PfTNAPJYNg pIdubI952H3lfQU64ooYkdx616EuoRlWhwIH3hEN9Zg2buzUIvU1zKOX+vI+o+03j/Vp WJqdLEltIjN4CemWq9+QuOVrVuAb5muA/hfioAhHoAnEu9Ww3Mn54WY7+VdG7WboMUns TWuOwcoYybUTJloW28TCCd8Z+m0ntV2r3qt/TyvHf++yxcu0kubaoXeDLT5uzu+RLaww frVTx2DFkftfqrHg5kOp2Qfk3ijyruPc4fDEhEjyzt5KtoBLvdgiLefNfxpqGL+gI8ie Y+Yg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gn42si5549141ejc.47.2021.06.04.01.56.22; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 01:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230016AbhFDI4k (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 04:56:40 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33036 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229953AbhFDI4k (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 04:56:40 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980291063; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 01:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 32FE43F774; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 01:54:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cristian Marussi Cc: Sudeep Holla , f.fainelli@gmail.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/5] Review/Extend SCMI Transport Core layer Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:54:50 +0100 Message-Id: <162279684371.1763354.4697663546315752509.b4-ty@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210601102421.26581-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20210601102421.26581-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 11:24:16 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > this short series is meant to review and extend a couple of SCMI transport > core layer mechanisms in order to ease the interaction with more complex > SCMI transport driver like the upcoming virtio-scmi and optee-scmi. > > The commits in this series have not and *should not* have any impact or > require any change in the currently existing SCMI transports. > > [...] Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks! [1/5] firmware: arm_scmi: reset_rx_to_maxsz during async commands https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/0cb7af474e -- Regards, Sudeep