Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:27:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:26:51 -0500 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:40669 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:26:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:25:49 +0100 Message-Id: <200111121625.fACGPnq03210@ns.caldera.de> From: Christoph Hellwig To: kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens) Cc: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: dalecki@evision.ag Subject: Re: PATCH 2.4.14 mregparm=3 compilation fixes X-Newsgroups: caldera.lists.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: <4300.1005581402@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.2 (i686)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <4300.1005581402@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> you wrote: > Setting mregparm must be a CONFIG_ option, with a huge warning that > > A) Changing CONFIG_MREGPARM requires make mrproper. The above patch changes the kernel to always use mregparm - it should be catched by the .flags depencies anyway. > B) Loading binary only modules into a kernel compiled with mregparm is > even more likely to destroy your kernel. Nope - people who uses those are just doomed. Christoph -- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/