Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753288AbWKCP4r (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:56:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753290AbWKCP4r (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:56:47 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:19423 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753288AbWKCP4p (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:56:45 -0500 Subject: Re: irqpoll kernel option hurts performance? From: Alan Cox To: xp newbie Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061103151026.28031.qmail@web38409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061103151026.28031.qmail@web38409.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:00:58 +0000 Message-Id: <1162569659.12810.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1851 Lines: 47 Ar Gwe, 2006-11-03 am 07:10 -0800, ysgrifennodd xp newbie: > Thank you, Alan. Indeed, it is a desktop machine so I > guess I should not be too concerned. I should note > hoever that while downloading an ISO image from the > Internet and doing nothing else (not even moving the > mouse), the System Monitor showed CPU usage of 15%. > The same machine booting to Windows 2000, shows in > such circumstances 0% CPU use (something lesser than > 1% to be more exact). The two systems don't measure performance the same way. That makes comparisons using their own monitoring tools a bit dubious and can make either OS look better in cases where it isn't > But that board, again, was running Windows 2000 > without any performance sacrifices... How does Windows > achieve that trick? I wish I knew. One possibility - especially as this appears to be the USB 2.0 is that it provides different rules for different OS's (thats intended to be a feature so it can hide EHCI from old windows etc) You might want to see if booting with the kernel option "acpi_noirq" has any effect for the better, you can also spoof different versions of windows for ACPI using acpi_os_name="Microsoft Windows" (Not sure how you spoof XP etc offhand but it should be documented somewhere) Various things are going on to improve the poor state of PC BIOSes including a firmware test kit from Intel. > I know that there is an issue with Promise > controllers, as Promise releases only binaries of its > drivers for Linux, not the source code. :( Actually promise are generally providing both docs and their own binary driver. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/