Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1280511pxj; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:14:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4tMNquh5cyop3CSP/gpvL3AXGqnY7oG1uBFde7gjRbZGJ20r9q3Tf20G+h99b3qGCYbIm X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2510:: with SMTP id i16mr5111331ejb.218.1622826872322; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:14:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622826872; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pP4cKWHWxX0vRJOyAQ8OeSAT1R/2pL3k1tLM1+wftRfoUUqWVBUBA0n4EOYfltnK+u wvyB2/EcVqPgaua9ZgZ1e5TcQSe6EIJX3t2lvApr6VFuUyeA4waKanEZN+1dvcPLPfd2 WAdCX+Cqf8RLW1BYq2JizdXR8hZIm0IFXd/4vwZDAsrOScWSXNriwKqMa/lHLGuqMU29 9ehBO1Xoj/F6xWrtmUxfJ2aQBGM3r7YCBzYS1sj3E1oeyELmkHgZLHazF6Ay8Cptx7/H 4lkBAUIT95z3nTuAi8+snoVnC6/zwWxIOILr5DNN4yJ41IKzjEwgKdWbk92a0HaOmSvN jcZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=zRwBlgeIz+d9qRclUefr+1eqJPE1ctHuuw4iGqoIwuU=; b=ERZYv+gFWpdNx/trNIPVRCoZPweJel4iES1/TNSn44snsPKjzicq1drTDqNVTCAysa MJ0l3N0yyKndLmT/5pT8gIfIcNH5jjx2ExQVSZEiI5YkXSMENxPoHid0BTKbeq43xVZK W/P52bYvkv95OEqm7P+kJxSyAW3Fk516Ptx51jy9j28Aqf/2IFUGolHdeCICR2yOU1MH fNKpVrc3AxC3X2NrnEIOlMPVG4OJAwPmKGtAzUpTjk3HYiP0RrG3zi/fgrzSwwmZK1Ih 3rjiqXHFwXciysglvsSLoh+YuDTHDT7O1BgXTyxt/7GY9PL/b30zNbJ3nUowBniNsee3 GCSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m19si4221177edd.548.2021.06.04.10.14.08; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230381AbhFDRNM (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:13:12 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:43798 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230311AbhFDRNL (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:13:11 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF6B1063; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 463F73F73D; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:11:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , Morten Rasmussen , Qais Yousef , Suren Baghdasaryan , Quentin Perret , Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dietmar Eggemann , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , kernel-team@android.com, Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/19] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() In-Reply-To: <20210602164719.31777-8-will@kernel.org> References: <20210602164719.31777-1-will@kernel.org> <20210602164719.31777-8-will@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 18:11:20 +0100 Message-ID: <875yyteerr.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/06/21 17:47, Will Deacon wrote: > Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support > across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by > some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do > not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters. > > Modify guarantee_online_cpus() to take task_cpu_possible_mask() into > account when trying to find a suitable set of online CPUs for a given > task. This will avoid passing an invalid mask to set_cpus_allowed_ptr() > during ->attach() and will subsequently allow the cpuset hierarchy to be > taken into account when forcefully overriding the affinity mask for a > task which requires migration to a compatible CPU. > > Cc: Li Zefan > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Johannes Weiner > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider