Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri,  4 Jun 2021 19:58:54 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20210604195900.2096121-1-satyat@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210604195900.2096121-5-satyat@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20210604195900.2096121-1-satyat@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment() in blk-crypto-fallback
From:   Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
To:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Make blk_crypto_split_bio_if_needed() respect
bio_required_sector_alignment() when calling bio_split(). Without this,
blk-crypto-fallback could possibly split a bio in the middle of a data
unit, and the resulting bios can no longer be encrypted (since encryption
can only be done on complete crypto data units).

Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
---
 block/blk-crypto-fallback.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c b/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
index c322176a1e09..85c813ef670b 100644
--- a/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
+++ b/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
 
+#include "blk.h"
 #include "blk-crypto-internal.h"
 
 static unsigned int num_prealloc_bounce_pg = 32;
@@ -225,6 +226,8 @@ static bool blk_crypto_split_bio_if_needed(struct bio **bio_ptr)
 	if (num_sectors < bio_sectors(bio)) {
 		struct bio *split_bio;
 
+		num_sectors = round_down(num_sectors,
+					 bio_required_sector_alignment(bio));
 		split_bio = bio_split(bio, num_sectors, GFP_NOIO,
 				      &crypto_bio_split);
 		if (!split_bio) {
-- 
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog