Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753441AbWKCSlg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:41:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753445AbWKCSlg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:41:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:56960 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753441AbWKCSlg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:41:36 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [patch] i386: remove IOPL check on task switch Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 19:41:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, linux-kernel , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton References: <200611030130_MC3-1-D02A-DEB@compuserve.com> <454B850C.3050402@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <454B850C.3050402@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611031941.28907.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 18 > Nack. This is used for paravirt-ops kernels that use IOPL'd userspace. > Fixing it would require a fairly heavy penalty on the iret path, since > every single instruction there contributes to a critical region which > must have custom fixup code, or some other technique to provide > protection against interrupt re-entrancy. > > At least, let's discuss other potential solutions first - for now it is > harmless. Ok I will drop the patch again -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/