Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753485AbWKCWBe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:01:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753497AbWKCWBe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:01:34 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:28394 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753485AbWKCWBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:01:33 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Amul Shah Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2.6.19-rc4] kdump panics early in boot when reserving MP Tables located in high memory Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 23:01:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, LKML References: <1162506272.19677.33.camel@ustr-linux-shaha1.unisys.com> <200611032052.05738.ak@suse.de> <1162588660.19677.118.camel@ustr-linux-shaha1.unisys.com> In-Reply-To: <1162588660.19677.118.camel@ustr-linux-shaha1.unisys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611032301.32094.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1434 Lines: 41 On Friday 03 November 2006 22:17, Amul Shah wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 20:52 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Friday 03 November 2006 20:47, Amul Shah wrote: > > > > > Andi, Vivek is right. We can use end_pfn_map. My observation is wrong. > > > > Ok. Then my patch should work? > > The patch does work on a 2.6.16 derived kernel (SLES 10 kernel). The > 2.6.19-rc4 kernel is doing some funny things when I use it as a kdump > kernel (regardless of the patch). Magnus had another patch for that which I applied ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/setup-saved_max_pfn-correctly-kdump Does it work with that? > > > Vivek, the problem condition is in generic reserve_bootmem_core > > > (mm/bootmem.c), where this > > > BUG_ON(PFN_DOWN(addr) >= bdata->node_low_pfn); > > > checks the target address against the top of that node's memory. > > > > In general these early BUGs should be eliminated - they are always > > messy because the kernel exception handlers are not fully functional > > yet. printks or worst case panics are better. > > > > -Andi > > I assume that we are not going to change mm/bootmem.c since your patch > works. Am I right? Yep. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/