Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:41:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:40:58 -0500 Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.148]:48693 "EHLO granger.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:40:50 -0500 From: joeja@mindspring.com Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:40:43 -0500 To: jjs@pobox.com Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: 4.20.162.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Okay, I can delete out those two lines to get loop working. Is 2.4.x really a stable tree? Or should I wait for 2.4.25 before I consider it really stable? > > Fran?ois Cami wrote: > > > > > yes, see 2.4.15pre1 > > > warning, the iptables code in 2.4.15pre1 and pre2 seems broken. > > > > and further it is likely that pre3 fixes iptables code :) > > (it looks like the patch got reverted) > > Actually it doesn't seem to be reverted, > just reworked - hmm, spoke too soon - looks like they were reverted after all... cu jjs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/