Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2815389pxj; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:18:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzennUPNCuHXhPvF2D5U4hUUEXU8S21HoeidDXWvr4gokdXspG6wph1HCNd9Rw1CaEw3s5g X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8345:: with SMTP id b5mr14975553ejy.14.1623017926281; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:18:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623017926; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ML6ZnWNIjbJo38pWB72Q4VHLeDYoH1oB6w68f86HYJyaf1if5dG2wnf4wlSQRjBwSu ORYRABsubAo5aGAmDPp+hY9LALTWEWneJEXLMUFl+j7lq8IcDx6m2npKldjFONKGEQZf ejx5YXN1nXrLif9MaLUNp4swUm9/Ipydtb8D5bDbCU75jM2i3WTSzpTmxMQikpK0WuMy xxvuL0fdBT75CXv94Z3soGsAFePpl/DxZOEz62Kp3QcxwDW156eIj2G5JXe8Dmtt60+4 s/Nvakgy0dT8Hi3r3IAnlThF+R6Efc9z3i9remTE+jTOtKpkND5OI8k7feU/D2+EMbFT +CTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=fRgJYGG/6j+VO3ToxKG49ZPjn11kwB+OpgITfwWA3jg=; b=cY7g8f/pS51UxE4Otccz589SqFZbkxMuHWdHJdQV+QqGkJ+uPc4SfOP50WEQlUw+p2 5n3rqLxFGOwoVfI/VqFdNmfCY58QPpMgdesj2EaJ6LmOwG9mXJtnvRmvJVZGNW7TSGKZ uCyWPkuBWP2W5ZqUnatBeoTqzOgNNuw6wOaOCbgh4dDg7P+yi1KHoDSc04C/sdRGFjVi jIdvL8O57V9+DNbYdRR9RL9zvysJXiBkrsX4GvGaPTSpMQ8LtKc/yylsqp5ZFUEa+JVX YLCMKLz57z75F5CECM5HriDAmbCsPNAcuZuuKHTBE9l3bR5USCw1BuVnhoZFDHiJTDTL aoRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m18si10812339ejl.45.2021.06.06.15.18.23; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231140AbhFFWPT (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:15:19 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46406 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230487AbhFFWPQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:15:16 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6A11D4; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 416C33F719; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:13:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/10] clk: scmi: Support atomic enable/disable API Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 23:12:30 +0100 Message-Id: <20210606221232.33768-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Support enable/disable clk_ops instead of prepare/unprepare when the underlying SCMI transport is configured to support atomic transactions for synchronous commands. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c index 1e357d364ca2..a07117d5e5bd 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c @@ -88,21 +88,42 @@ static void scmi_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) scmi_proto_clk_ops->disable(clk->ph, clk->id); } +/* + * We can provide enable/disable atomic callbacks only if the underlying SCMI + * transport for this SCMI instance is configured to handle synchronous commands + * in an atomic manner. + * + * When no SCMI atomic transport support is available we instead provide the + * prepare/unprepare API, as allowed by the clock framework where atomic calls + * are not available. + * + * Note that the provided clk_ops implementations are the same in both cases, + * using indeed the same underlying SCMI clock_protocol operations, it's just + * that they are assured to act in an atomic manner or not depending on the + * actual underlying SCMI transport configuration. + * + * Two distinct sets of clk_ops are provided since we could have multiple SCMI + * instances with different underlying transport quality, so they cannot be + * shared. + */ static const struct clk_ops scmi_clk_ops = { .recalc_rate = scmi_clk_recalc_rate, .round_rate = scmi_clk_round_rate, .set_rate = scmi_clk_set_rate, - /* - * We can't provide enable/disable callback as we can't perform the same - * in atomic context. Since the clock framework provides standard API - * clk_prepare_enable that helps cases using clk_enable in non-atomic - * context, it should be fine providing prepare/unprepare. - */ .prepare = scmi_clk_enable, .unprepare = scmi_clk_disable, }; -static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk) +static const struct clk_ops scmi_atomic_clk_ops = { + .recalc_rate = scmi_clk_recalc_rate, + .round_rate = scmi_clk_round_rate, + .set_rate = scmi_clk_set_rate, + .enable = scmi_clk_enable, + .disable = scmi_clk_disable, +}; + +static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk, + const struct clk_ops *scmi_ops) { int ret; unsigned long min_rate, max_rate; @@ -110,7 +131,7 @@ static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk) struct clk_init_data init = { .flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, .num_parents = 0, - .ops = &scmi_clk_ops, + .ops = scmi_ops, .name = sclk->info->name, }; @@ -145,6 +166,7 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; const struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle; struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph; + bool is_atomic; if (!handle) return -ENODEV; @@ -168,6 +190,8 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) clk_data->num = count; hws = clk_data->hws; + is_atomic = handle->is_transport_atomic(handle); + for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) { struct scmi_clk *sclk; @@ -184,7 +208,9 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev) sclk->id = idx; sclk->ph = ph; - err = scmi_clk_ops_init(dev, sclk); + err = scmi_clk_ops_init(dev, sclk, + is_atomic ? &scmi_atomic_clk_ops : + &scmi_clk_ops); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "failed to register clock %d\n", idx); devm_kfree(dev, sclk); -- 2.17.1