Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2815617pxj; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:19:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh18y7MRwqjTH/BsT7eXGl2liVuXx8vMBj+2Brvskj7VHGFENhsAcuDYElEdUHklM/n+zL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:27d6:: with SMTP id k22mr15457753ejc.323.1623017956284; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:19:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623017956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ESQX8ikNbLrvohJUF5cgAJdUf2K1g+57QlVKOVOHAPJGdDDHxMINs2Hiz3SIEhfGcI ObsEjQrN1GCC6Ax75vpPcPEl2nP5y60s7oQHLJRw5Q0an7rTIVbj4x7M39pCKexrXu6G hpPBoKtpvsvvFT7tt1gLhgKnqIqmyVceZH/7uXe1063S1MLK8tM8BoMrry0xJkHCzYIm kyhO0rzAVok9plZ2f6PLd+aVZQeeCvQ+zfYnACGLhXh+fX4rmh1zTsOw5PHWeSdUAgnI tiPbnCuIAH/QTIj+Xb+NqiO3y2nqMXYUL6n2HmfZEyvXkKMClIY/2ia5lUQIe4p1JLQK /IaA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=GV2D9ZyuXCkkExHd4y8f0nvAgaTx7kLmduV1pVc0lcE=; b=EWAO2gbf8Fvt7HeuQNKXqRRPIBo2pTP0oRL3vlq07Y6jE0ketoTqiBLIblV6Ot/rE+ SEdjYERQ2to2uRMpHHmjYG00ZuPCBVZCK9lTeOJ/DBHOAyGbO2xHeXwFu7q8GPo+ZJTl lOV6pqQNFcou5ffHozRbBbcL/3tHXMObGAukx1Slvbpjd/EsfXhqqsdxELirNNuewdal vUd6dAKYKg8s2vwmOqB2hjMBc9IZL0xWimB2i6OrvWIDeO6O3lJzjnqJuG9A3AaRh5xU Z4ceX7bDs4Gpfw5QerPoJSK49QXObB3DbL5mzphLFSjHwakvbWOl3YYD9aZIIYcXMpqp iJRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z62si13052598ede.508.2021.06.06.15.18.48; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230500AbhFFWPN (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:15:13 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46356 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230514AbhFFWPJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:15:09 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BB531B; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 157743F719; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:13:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/10] include: trace: Add new scmi_xfer_response_wait event Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 23:12:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20210606221232.33768-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Having a new step to trace SCMI stack while it waits for synchronous responses is useful to analyze system performance when changing waiting mode between polling and interrupt completion. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- include/trace/events/scmi.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/trace/events/scmi.h b/include/trace/events/scmi.h index f3a4b4d60714..ba82082f30d7 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/scmi.h +++ b/include/trace/events/scmi.h @@ -33,6 +33,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_begin, __entry->seq, __entry->poll) ); +TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_response_wait, + TP_PROTO(int transfer_id, u8 msg_id, u8 protocol_id, u16 seq, + bool poll, bool atomic), + TP_ARGS(transfer_id, msg_id, protocol_id, seq, poll, atomic), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(int, transfer_id) + __field(u8, msg_id) + __field(u8, protocol_id) + __field(u16, seq) + __field(bool, poll) + __field(bool, atomic) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->transfer_id = transfer_id; + __entry->msg_id = msg_id; + __entry->protocol_id = protocol_id; + __entry->seq = seq; + __entry->poll = poll; + __entry->atomic = atomic; + ), + + TP_printk("transfer_id=%d msg_id=%u protocol_id=%u seq=%u poll=%u atomic=%u", + __entry->transfer_id, __entry->msg_id, __entry->protocol_id, + __entry->seq, __entry->poll, __entry->atomic) +); + TRACE_EVENT(scmi_xfer_end, TP_PROTO(int transfer_id, u8 msg_id, u8 protocol_id, u16 seq, int status), -- 2.17.1