Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2816018pxj; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:20:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKidNWSz5yIQXDXz4FHqPLo877pNRhybZbf4YvI7EVCGc7oe5bhjG39y6DDEN1kh96xh53 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1c5:: with SMTP id bw5mr15102042ejb.552.1623018011968; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:20:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623018011; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qByMqsCbvvlTKGKTUpG1oLZ1DpSABwraIp9NTfkQKZWLCz9qEnKf3+ZWg/grZmiSWp uzF0fS1c/dJqgaxAUdtY2wSoekLJWAl8qUdEICfmHvNpzgwl4PL4lkQGYZCbI0QgQVec 50GVhUP8JYfSoyFfey6zR7YOFxaXQWMUyaSxBYa91RfNEnFB1Ih6ehNWLLvzYz6m5bh5 lbyFBpTGEdyKh7swvScNWuUtEPvHdf85F6uOz1p4lR+SpxH9mxyjMbH4t5AV5Lh96ubM VmFrJlJnehzcEfgx7hxjJXYZ7dioLUAf0o2ZXBSQKzGSywa4JbJ7O8itF+fDNhc8Q66s wGIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=9m6QYwiSz7NsZzcs7Odh15LqTWSCrp9CCKLSky9ehfs=; b=Sws12/SuehbE80dg7IdP4pf3kl+pwrp7rIHrstDq11W6R9fpyaGZLB03wX8rUt/flI Jgn57zZDwrqFYlJnIUqiiYF2Uf5Ml2RENBkQOeJj0sLpYJc7ZOpMKAqYr9U2b2kkj+Bb t6uMlCbX7bOiqQivfMSJgTXOnzx9i4BZ+0EB2rWVMHEUL/dW72YKXqNB71MWzLW3G+h2 S0lLSwsCO6VHsuR09qM1UQpMh91sRcbDE8pNkJfe5MkX3KaS5JaD4BBvkeBzzf1wqQPg bOIDiQRdKXxMG1U/RvxOkrxLYuckFaaZ1RvrAmxICOgCuwXDaDrchReKBTFcn2/5CYcz 7SYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10si6042760edw.252.2021.06.06.15.19.50; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231176AbhFFWPV (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:15:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46418 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230514AbhFFWPS (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 18:15:18 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1079831B; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 439BE3F719; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:13:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/10] firmware: arm-scmi: Make smc transport use common completions Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 23:12:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20210606221232.33768-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When a completion irq is available use it and delegate command completion handling to the core SCMI completion mechanism. If no completion irq is available revert to polling, using the core common polling machinery. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c index bed5596c7209..cab1d0d50d8e 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ * @shmem: Transmit/Receive shared memory area * @shmem_lock: Lock to protect access to Tx/Rx shared memory area * @func_id: smc/hvc call function id - * @irq: Optional; employed when platforms indicates msg completion by intr. - * @tx_complete: Optional, employed only when irq is valid. */ struct scmi_smc { @@ -34,15 +32,13 @@ struct scmi_smc { struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem; struct mutex shmem_lock; u32 func_id; - int irq; - struct completion tx_complete; }; static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data) { struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = data; - complete(&scmi_info->tx_complete); + scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo, shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem)); return IRQ_HANDLED; } @@ -111,8 +107,9 @@ static int smc_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev, dev_err(dev, "failed to setup SCMI smc irq\n"); return ret; } - init_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete); - scmi_info->irq = irq; + } else { + /* No completion interrupt available */ + cinfo->needs_polling = true; } scmi_info->func_id = func_id; @@ -142,25 +139,20 @@ static int smc_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info; struct arm_smccc_res res; + /* + * Channel lock will be released only once response has been + * surely fully retrieved, so after .mark_txdone() + */ mutex_lock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); - shmem_tx_prepare(scmi_info->shmem, xfer); - if (scmi_info->irq) - reinit_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete); - arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(scmi_info->func_id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); - - if (scmi_info->irq) - wait_for_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete); - - scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo, shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem)); - - mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); - /* Only SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is valid error code */ - if (res.a0) + if (res.a0) { + mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + return 0; } @@ -172,6 +164,13 @@ static void smc_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, shmem_fetch_response(scmi_info->shmem, xfer); } +static void smc_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret) +{ + struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info; + + mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); +} + static bool smc_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { @@ -185,6 +184,7 @@ static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = { .chan_setup = smc_chan_setup, .chan_free = smc_chan_free, .send_message = smc_send_message, + .mark_txdone = smc_mark_txdone, .fetch_response = smc_fetch_response, .poll_done = smc_poll_done, }; -- 2.17.1