Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932367AbWKDGWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:22:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932374AbWKDGWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:22:52 -0500 Received: from teetot.devrandom.net ([66.35.250.243]:56797 "EHLO teetot.devrandom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932367AbWKDGWw (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:22:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:22:51 -0800 From: thockin@hockin.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: John , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux.nics@intel.com Subject: Re: Intel 82559 NIC corrupted EEPROM Message-ID: <20061104062251.GA15100@hockin.org> References: <454B7C3A.3000308@privacy.net> <454BF0F1.5050700@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <454BF0F1.5050700@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1078 Lines: 21 On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:46:25PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Basically, Auke wants you to throw away your NIC and/or motherboard. > Since you're effectively dead, the only damage you can do by disabling > the check has already been done. This unfortunately seems to be fairly > common with e100, especially for the on-motherboard version, and you > basically have two options: either disable the check or write an offline > tool to reprogram the EEPROM. I have a tool to write the eepro100 EEPROM. Let me see if I can find it. It even had all the default data coded, ready to restore a NIC to default. However - back in the eepro100.c days, it was considered a warning only if the EEPROM had a bad checksum. There were two "supported" formats for the EEPROM, one of which was just the MAC address. And it worked! Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/