Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1622558659.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
 <e91af9d8f8d6e376635005fd111e9fe7a1c50fea.1622558659.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
 <bd824ec8-48af-b554-67a1-7ce20fcf608c@kernel.dk>
 <409a624c-de75-0ee5-b65f-ee09fff34809@gmail.com>
 <bdc55fcd-b172-def4-4788-8bf808ccf6d6@kernel.dk>
 <5ab4c8bd-3e82-e87b-1ae8-3b32ced72009@gmail.com>
 <87sg211ccj.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20210603190338.gfykgkc7ac2akvdt@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <87v96tywcb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <131a59af-a625-27b3-433e-ff8b7c36753e@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:31:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87v96tywcb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/5/21 1:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Andres,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> You surely made your point that this is well thought out.
>>
>> Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first
>> version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting
>> feedback on the basic design and the different use cases.
> 
> feedback on what?
> 
> There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no
> use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about?

That's a complete fallacy, the very RFC is about clarifying a
use case that I was hinted about, not mentioning those I described
you in a reply. Obviously

-- 
Pavel Begunkov