Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:48:26 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait
Message-ID: <YL4Hiq+2rMGYrQAH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <cover.1622558659.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
 <e91af9d8f8d6e376635005fd111e9fe7a1c50fea.1622558659.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
 <bd824ec8-48af-b554-67a1-7ce20fcf608c@kernel.dk>
 <409a624c-de75-0ee5-b65f-ee09fff34809@gmail.com>
 <bdc55fcd-b172-def4-4788-8bf808ccf6d6@kernel.dk>
 <5ab4c8bd-3e82-e87b-1ae8-3b32ced72009@gmail.com>
 <87sg211ccj.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20210603190338.gfykgkc7ac2akvdt@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <87v96tywcb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <131a59af-a625-27b3-433e-ff8b7c36753e@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <131a59af-a625-27b3-433e-ff8b7c36753e@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/5/21 1:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Andres,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> You surely made your point that this is well thought out.
> >>
> >> Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first
> >> version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting
> >> feedback on the basic design and the different use cases.
> > 
> > feedback on what?
> > 
> > There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no
> > use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about?
> 
> That's a complete fallacy, the very RFC is about clarifying a
> use case that I was hinted about, not mentioning those I described
> you in a reply. Obviously

Then consider this:

Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

for anything touching futex.c, until such time that you can provide a
coherent description of what and why you're doing things.