Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3298901pxj; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/RYZqTXbX7zULRZYKHA98XDtqLoZsLpSgMUe9m8wX+vPxgKTYHS79gNm3dPAwfuPza1p8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1046:: with SMTP id e6mr20406700edu.218.1623075787012; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623075787; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t5BSOIvS8WDwmAJMmpcQjtUPfzIs0MRqCjGKcY622i2Kf+ftXNIUW49ElELL5Q0ZMi QPSllyyl9NQ+3CFUpjppHvlkV1lNtrW7WAZv3t5hwFIdimZ8PiVIb/dmpqvdZAU0PsDh 8pwlwFb/06UiRM5i/aAzd6/UPOOL4e1g4wWbIDsWHEkkOPIq4/QD4/O9l5TS5KJNT7ev y84/Aq9dVtcMs+eBh03+D/6YgKCNsOOHC7HwANsEdzy0gQ7i+yYLokonh2C8RSJF0S38 /26JJTmvLUDzVZTCXHJSPVbjukmBPGYgQF8rSEeYha2R6nZU7uLhYwcOyob/pYZL7vhR P+bA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=/W7QdJ0pNKu0G/Jpr2lieRQ3nvMKxgUynmwjevp+ExI=; b=IZsg0a4izy/JI8ROQXDW6KsenJmgr7qvOaK1Q1ATd+qMhoAPrqzMdL7f0VoOwUCZ5T wfBeV3Kh1KL6TNbQPMjYTofg0DXgDK0sfmYoaxg7wiWkE6VLo+yUzWad+WpnbT8OMHcT wAM3uDiGKKRh/oHT7XgzKBeMiK2LoEYPDB0risvyh/RlP4jgkH9y6wwRPC8+CiuFod5D 7/QIHa3nMAcu2eAz4q5Tckny+9wPO2EMe9uQiaCFKP2jcAG5Fd2dOlvW4pS5X4yicM7B DhqStKD/eVu9j0d9+gCinAd+S+BoOzlpV0LZaoZxTk2LJhwy0Ev6D+Uga/mZdOtSqGxg iFeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a9si11977951ejj.647.2021.06.07.07.22.43; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230254AbhFGOUj (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:20:39 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com ([209.85.167.178]:37382 "EHLO mail-oi1-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230200AbhFGOUi (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:20:38 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id h9so18193489oih.4; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:18:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/W7QdJ0pNKu0G/Jpr2lieRQ3nvMKxgUynmwjevp+ExI=; b=B4K564OmTQ76uYv5bry7DEzBZCUHKhFWVHwfulEEsK/DZv8ZcJYVTEyJnaX6Co+xIs N7IcPngg5aoXaPQdCA5lA51Z68q2MAq6hRm63FQwxrwvv021V+1ELu9xBEj6m1ncTlDf aRuAfgSJ9u4Z+afA1Usq177eEVGGgkgm8T04LgjCJa14bM5YAzmVJnbC5ymiixWMVhpc BfeuPKsNDbzWkB0Q+qiOD20WhL11s5mCdVEP4eVAvQjw2hX56YuCY5VgUskYDifeh5ms PfKjOD511Ivo6x67kyFE+hn6Iaat4/LUcLGpKS8sN3Zg9a6u9sR6S6BXAxLr0qNC3IrP tsnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jP80N8T4TlkpqPGyoBWtna5c3t1iSP/rykbBr01cvJKj8r6zo h7P0R8vZSQuKxD7hBZMBAdtqGRbQoiqHFf8HZYY= X-Received: by 2002:aca:650d:: with SMTP id m13mr3373519oim.157.1623075526875; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:18:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210603205047.GA2135380@bjorn-Precision-5520> <20210604170938.GA2218177@bjorn-Precision-5520> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:18:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/APCI: Move acpi_pci_osc_support() check to negotiation phase To: Joerg Roedel Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Joerg Roedel , Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:14 PM Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:09 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > If either "pcie_ports_disabled" or Linux doesn't support everything in > > > ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT, we will never evaluate _OSC at all, so > > > the platform won't know that Linux has OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT, > > > OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT, OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT, etc. > > > > Right. > > Thanks Bjorn and Rafael. So I think the important thing to do is to > issue at least one _OSC call even when Linux is not trying to take > control of anything. > > I look into a clean way to do this and get the kernel messages right. > One thing to change is probably only calculating 'control' if > !pcie_ports_disabled in negotiate_os_control(). Please also see https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/93d783c4-4468-023b-193e-3fc6eca35445@redhat.com/ for possible clashes etc.