Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965726AbWKDWgv (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:36:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965724AbWKDWgv (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:36:51 -0500 Received: from artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.125]:30921 "EHLO artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965727AbWKDWgu (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:36:50 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 23:36:49 +0100 (CET) From: Mikulas Patocka To: Albert Cahalan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2048 CPUs [was: Re: New filesystem for Linux] In-Reply-To: <787b0d920611041154l69db46abv4c8c467809ada57c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <787b0d920611041154l69db46abv4c8c467809ada57c@mail.gmail.com> X-Personality-Disorder: Schizoid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 853 Lines: 22 >> Does one Linux kernel run on system with 1024 cpus? I guess it >> must fry spinlocks... (or even lockup due to spinlock livelocks) > > The SGI Altix can have 2048 CPUs. And does it run one image of Linux? Or more images each on few cpus? How do they solve problem with spinlock livelocks? If time-spent-outside-spinlock/time-spent-in-spinlock < number-of-cpus, the spinlock livelock may happen --- this condition is not true normally with 2 or 4 cpus, but for that high amount of cpus, there is a danger. Or do they have some special hardware spinlock instruction that guarantees fairness? Mikulas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/