Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3444812pxj; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:44:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNZkV4jFnrQA0uof/lOkDeqsRkS9yCXQXiBJDqohGMo0XQQNzsmL1z7Zz389LTD7vkH8ZK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a293:: with SMTP id i19mr18396518ejz.311.1623087877013; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:44:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623087877; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LqsZWEh1YU2w29SI+6GgsdVCVlYZBy/172NGoS3A39kBGNmJpTGGZpVxhKF8t3Bkxy fFL1JEuR9Cy1qQ62k9C4ZaQ7XDQ0NXjDc35hK4SS7oJUUJKJadzw0soFxIiQqrrfZ2QH XOvWJI8YxA6J1yq3iUNiArn8kKxuN3cQ/loCNewTIa+0XNwFWywxKAYSn2ttw0zP9HHh muJJbJorepAWzqko6zFWUmJW+L55tY5eGO1Pw9a5X1MTb2sbcmtZ6D4ALAFT5BLuqbdz 53EEWZB99NXrpXL9Ojk2CJsTLM+13lkHo6d5EbXqclQmPyfx3/h9lf8lQo8xdmaz2zju OeAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=f8+7RNkiHGOPxzmS36QqSb2DOFnW4lcbRhXuUtJZZPI=; b=BLBfU2EnBeae2E3RDQoCqsvay4KUK6pT/cS9avEnY5sTvLPt15I14EwUSwd36MJYAh VA2wcXOHVplodFtnRZVaoM8E489SwlNkoeWswpTPb7iLdTkAC4g0w2Z3zQA6l/SSTQBM q+mrOKDvu2+2er4T7W3whVeBG+rfxwFA0HZvMtc407pY4OogzvHZSfHV0sXa+BuGRlHY DKljDYWXIW/wDkpG0mFgljdzd/bQPTP9wVycHDvxy02nhm9JxlI2+f88jXrYB5gWjmnj VHM6j9w5kOBX00c1CCisTwEQd6D8dlV58fTNzKmEfWV1dJ1dZtU5NDq5Jvj75AoiZ/H9 RN3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n15si12838292ejl.587.2021.06.07.10.44.12; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230291AbhFGRpK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:45:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39002 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229997AbhFGRpJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:45:09 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA6612FC; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.73.170]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 670063F73D; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:42:57 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add missing xfer reinit_completion Message-ID: <20210607174142.jdirvbasvgl7q4oj@bogus> References: <20210606221232.33768-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210606221232.33768-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210606221232.33768-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 11:12:24PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Reusing timed out xfers in a loop can lead to issue if completion was not > properly reinitialized. > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > index bee33f9c2032..759ae4a23e74 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ static int do_xfer(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > xfer->hdr.poll_completion); > > xfer->hdr.status = SCMI_SUCCESS; > + reinit_completion(&xfer->done); > What could happen after xfer_get_init->scmi_xfer_get->reinit_completion that it needs to be re-initialised again. I don't see any reason for this ? If there are, please state them explicitly. If this is needed, I would drop the one in scmi_xfer_get(). -- Regards, Sudeep