Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 18:31:47 -0500
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     khsieh@codeaurora.org, swboyd@chromium.org
Cc:     robdclark@gmail.com, sean@poorly.run, vkoul@kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        abhinavk@codeaurora.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org,
        freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/dts/qcom/sc7180: Add Display Port dt node
Message-ID: <YL6sY/1E5wLzMiP/@yoga>
References: <1622736555-15775-1-git-send-email-khsieh@codeaurora.org>
 <YLkI/6ItCz+SbbuJ@yoga>
 <ac326ec8689c0babb08b2311e19d52cc@codeaurora.org>
 <YLxX/YtegtbLmkri@builder.lan>
 <ef1879fa7ecfefaf0c70c7a4782240a9@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ef1879fa7ecfefaf0c70c7a4782240a9@codeaurora.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 07 Jun 12:48 CDT 2021, khsieh@codeaurora.org wrote:

> On 2021-06-05 22:07, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 03 Jun 16:56 CDT 2021, khsieh@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2021-06-03 09:53, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Thu 03 Jun 11:09 CDT 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor.dtsi
> > [..]
> > > > > +				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > > >
> > > > Just curious, but isn't the DP block in the MDSS_GDCS? Or do we need to
> > > > mention CX here in order for the opp framework to apply required-opps
> > > > of CX?
> > > 
> > > yes,
> > 
> > If you want me, or other maintainers, to spend any time reviewing or
> > applying your patches going forward then you need to actually bother
> > replying properly to the questions asked.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bjorn
> 
> Sorry about the confusion. What I meant is that even though DP controller is
> in the MDSS_GDSC
> power domain, DP PHY/PLL sources out of CX. The DP link clocks have a direct
> impact
> on the CX voltage corners. Therefore, we need to mention the CX power domain
> here. And, since
> we can associate only one OPP table with one device, we picked the DP link
> clock over other
> clocks.

Thank you, that's a much more useful answer.

Naturally I would think it would make more sense for the PHY/PLL driver
to ensure that CX is appropriately voted for then, but I think that
would result in it being the clock driver performing such vote and I'm
unsure how the opp table for that would look.

@Stephen, what do you say?

Regards,
Bjorn