Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4095029pxj; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:24:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvRHUyhujLzCI2ldIBe/C1odWke0oVyqhYySx3zfcCvk1lv5a/uFstfZ9z9mByGbpy3BHw X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1d0:: with SMTP id bw16mr23674565ejb.146.1623158676954; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623158676; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Rc6ryntt99oHNtx+DVJ1eokFBvmsoldiKTiATB2hdx5g5+zgx0RcapVAEDW0hFevUe nnoNSoalxie2mcCGrrOs+5OkVpslbVaFT2bgVGEAUhMHdOchS2IQo0bJjrc5Bp5ba2M3 vvEJxrnhSx6nLWbjozXetjHfmq7JARMH8GnUdzvfTX4GUNPMqZ+3wJRFuXupCQSvvLXE sTlPXkbx+TQSdyfx7hU1tz2mtLVlCSyau0I6aiFJqLrJUz4yA4FY7j+eifIVUfntcaVo g+wqhnYdDAIqYZ1KFMMgfOt8bR6G1K3jv1r45xawleQUCLq+koSMPte7a5d9SH71wXSt zElQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=WtCNs2ryHqGsqVwthpY5NLKcx8uWgfSqW57GzV9Lzts=; b=lAvllb09IU/WW7Na86kPuWIMHudypu7Qobhr5D2OkyNFypBsqD94wY0FSpHT6SR68Q j4lJokEtq0Rgb9Y97y2RVNDYMzLYQ8vChzh+yjfhuG24XAAmzYjtMR0eqpyj74wmosVV ocTpA4F7yFswin6dJ2GWcuO8jAXSTcAOdJ/+BB69HxtZBQLI7HGIW0bZmXuoRGiglPC8 C5NoIoLhg0HXUhhiwu4cpXYJUxxX14f9uGALq4elMXF8vvXxXxLBFtgFvC7/fwA/x6+9 8rvfXKcfRJh1OC7+cZ8Mem6Na71qzXrkB0uiys7yYwnMSglKc0EBigC733pCJJj6K3zL wKVg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k18si14861949edr.529.2021.06.08.06.24.13; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232973AbhFHNWE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:22:04 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3909 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232933AbhFHNWC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 09:22:02 -0400 Received: from dggeme766-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FzrP86Wkbz6wLK; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:17:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.113.133) by dggeme766-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:20:03 +0800 From: Wang Hai To: , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: x25: Use list_for_each_entry() to simplify code in x25_forward.c Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:30:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20210608133007.69476-1-wanghai38@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.133] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggeme766-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.112) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() where applicable. This simplifies the code. Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Wang Hai --- net/x25/x25_forward.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/x25/x25_forward.c b/net/x25/x25_forward.c index d48ad6d29197..21b30b56e889 100644 --- a/net/x25/x25_forward.c +++ b/net/x25/x25_forward.c @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, { struct x25_route *rt; struct x25_neigh *neigh_new = NULL; - struct list_head *entry; struct x25_forward *x25_frwd, *new_frwd; struct sk_buff *skbn; short same_lci = 0; @@ -46,8 +45,7 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, * established LCI? It shouldn't happen, just in case.. */ read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) { - x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node); + list_for_each_entry(x25_frwd, &x25_forward_list, node) { if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) { pr_warn("call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n"); same_lci = 1; @@ -92,15 +90,13 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, int x25_forward_data(int lci, struct x25_neigh *from, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct x25_forward *frwd; - struct list_head *entry; struct net_device *peer = NULL; struct x25_neigh *nb; struct sk_buff *skbn; int rc = 0; read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) { - frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node); + list_for_each_entry(frwd, &x25_forward_list, node) { if (frwd->lci == lci) { /* The call is established, either side can send */ if (from->dev == frwd->dev1) { -- 2.17.1