Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:39:42 +0200
From:   Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= <mkoutny@suse.com>
To:     Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on
 unthrottle
Message-ID: <YL+dTtsCtZjMeZWn@blackbook>
References: <20210604102314.697749-1-odin@uged.al>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bjCpVaBEdcHpnVsT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210604102314.697749-1-odin@uged.al>
Precedence: bulk


--bjCpVaBEdcHpnVsT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello.

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al> wrote:

> @@ -4719,8 +4738,8 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, =
void *data)
>  		cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time +=3D rq_clock_task(rq) -
>  					     cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
> =20
> -		/* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
> -		if (cfs_rq->nr_running >=3D 1)
> +		/* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the=
 list */
> +		if (!cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) || cfs_rq->nr_running)
>  			list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>  	}

Can there be a decayed cfs_rq with positive nr_running?
I.e. can the condition be simplified to just the decayed check?

(I'm looking at account_entity_enqueue() but I don't know if an entity's
weight can be zero in some singular cases.)

Thanks,
Michal

--bjCpVaBEdcHpnVsT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=CXYl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bjCpVaBEdcHpnVsT--