Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4711270pxj; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 23:20:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzF6MmGli2l4R2+AChPR9xYd62yFgFToSPJqr+Sv/unlrSNJs92E3kwCOruBNLbRhPg27R5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6d14:: with SMTP id m20mr26137899ejr.504.1623219653190; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 23:20:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623219653; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KyJdHyPRTpamcvJK9MP8PAEm2GPaamfsjf5L8rj2ldjbMCmxdDC9M/22QMIrT/+vqX bdnJ3rM+CN/k9Cs3XzAj/N5T1pvIHdaXdhfDyGcCoRzqQenzFRdgu6vd52mrnOGRlEOc 4eYx5k38qkge4LY05n6bjN7G0Hor4S3gLzBKtjgmkE+Qkx0zkdO/uNsI6VtBAe6ni0NZ FCg432ehQ/MPtYClCviqsp/+VPKhLXa5mKbhw63WEEWRWVLBQvVuOoKoghWmwn9EXDe3 /8O6X/jhbO3Fw8qXMUHfJ1g3w0yUBaXucsWkbxikPub7Rw5pSrmB5t/cXpLRg1HJk1UM ocxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=Lrbmu3l8Y/lnjDL3SFu8B/7gi18pZihOzuUr/ey4j6o=; b=knhOYkgltTDNeYHqJQ16gdoTl9IooFxNX55KliTDSlQ4Zf509VZmrQ2fAF0SlGxzK7 OwPn/LJ7eOlolyuSxMpcQI1T5zupWdKoQ6XX+pZb21wlKfwfEHhLpU79mfSHRBJl6z0m bzsPbs970SSFD4MWdmXIe1hgJH4cVa3v/XppXgZj1D7uf0kzED08s6K9XCePS2ObPYUe /knHAG7b8RE5pjvamQXyAZF+p4rH/vrQvm0r+3rC9FfRAC8gEPUE1E5FZMonxg1d9lcc d4I0J9eoJd8RrHJGqpy1qt79C7Xiu/J39vfgJ130CBNX055gqUkIGPQjnXjwGe1FDqcg /Mug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1si1634143edv.421.2021.06.08.23.20.30; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 23:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232943AbhFHQrp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:47:45 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0077.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.77]:54426 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232807AbhFHQro (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:47:44 -0400 Received: from omf11.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1E7181D3042; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5128B20A299; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] staging: r8188eu: use eth_broadcast_addr() to assign broadcast address From: Joe Perches To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Liu Shixin Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:45:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20210608141620.525521-1-liushixin2@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.32 X-Stat-Signature: p9wydgr8pharduzuarqe1ngfenzwejnj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5128B20A299 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1/YiXAixKRd9sc3PQad8sltguXjxgVCQV8= X-HE-Tag: 1623170750-172711 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 16:12 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 10:16:20PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote: > > Use eth_broadcast_addr() to assign broadcast address. > > That says what you do, but not _why_ you are doing this? > > Why make this change? What benifit does it provide? The commit message is clear and concise as using available kernel mechanisms is better than homegrown or duplicative ones. Are you asking merely becuse Liu Shixin hasn't had many staging commits?