Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423698AbWKFKNx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:13:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423724AbWKFKNx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:13:53 -0500 Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:23954 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423698AbWKFKNw (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:13:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:13:29 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Pavel Machek Cc: Jonathan Lemon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Message-ID: <20061106101329.GA16817@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20061103163012.GA84707@cave.trolltruffles.com> <20061105204741.GA1847@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061105204741.GA1847@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.5 (2ka.mipt.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 06 Nov 2006 13:13:30 +0300 (MSK) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 653 Lines: 16 On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz) wrote: > It has been show in this thread that kevent is too different to kqueue > as is... but what are the advantages of kevent? Perhaps we should use > kqueue on Linux, too (even if it means one more rewrite for you...?) Should we use *BSD VMM system when we have superiour Linux one? P.S. Do not drop Cc: list. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/