Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750991AbWKFKrk (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:47:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751010AbWKFKrk (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:47:40 -0500 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([62.219.232.206]:9684 "EHLO cleopatra.q") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890AbWKFKrj (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: <454F12C7.4070504@qumranet.com> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:47:35 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061008) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/14] KVM: userspace interface References: <454E4941.7000108@qumranet.com> <20061105202934.B5F842500A7@cleopatra.q> <1162807420.3160.186.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <454F0E4A.7030001@qumranet.com> <1162809128.3160.201.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1162809128.3160.201.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 50 Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> \> as a general rule, it's a lot better to sort structures big-to-small, to >> >>> make sure alignments inside the struct are minimized and don't suck too >>> much. This is especially important to get right for 32/64 bit >>> compatibility. This comment is true for most structures in this header >>> file; please consider this at least >>> >>> >> Doesn't that cause an unnatural field order? >> > > Does it matter? > > Just a matter of taste. >> for example, in some >> structures I separated in and out variables. Sorting by size is a bit >> like sorting alphabetically. >> >> Anyway I observed 32/64 bit compatibility religiously. >> > > but you did take the alignment rules of 64 bit variables into account, > eg 32 bit has it 4 byte aligned, while 64 bit has it 8 byte aligned.. > you are 100% sure even your 32 bit structures have all 64 bit values 8 > byte aligned? > (you get this automatic if you sort by size) > Also you made sure that if you have such implicit padding that you zero > out the memory between the fields to avoid information leaks? > I put explicit padding everywhere. > Sorting by size at least makes this all go away..... > > True. I'll rethink it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/