Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5060808pxj; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxv+/0Mqi7whTjsAklNHoLh3cOYnjkYgygVbBnx7qLJfv1SjOQz6lfAtyMcorN+EmMUam1v X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:498b:: with SMTP id p11mr365090eju.295.1623251827646; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623251827; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cxdNVxJM2StJiHASm11AEMTNrq1MfB1nJRmLm91DpTrvoufVFB0jfyogigtkMBXvuL sqXImfrRkst+CqBne6uKVo8Zqs1BAGcIWnmKMkn12QUc1F+2guNh5Kz1i1TFAZWHxVep fT6BdRKYcH/5bZwZg+xHfMRzLTvLJZZ8CUZWuBeIxkoUkD20vaZAcWK/rzT6e3Raebiu dHhA0g/d8fl1oFOUMKwnU/vpv7aPrkJLJxRNxE9y2BM4SjzsJl8mih2+3+t/DIEhsQ+l nWI41p9oo0w6hI+RO7+DgH5to6MteAG0ggCLjrClpeVkpAPEAajXosmeByCJ0i7PZh2v ReDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=RN2brbbRdY8gj7J8DSoaUDdn4ifRvMYEP7XOSVYIUjI=; b=uGSBnmx3pU84ZEgVvJY2wrrd0IXaLACDFnXBj1asHAFMHwhopHrBBTgZYRTCwi5xuZ EUZ89cLVNw+uGYro8oX+cW4BF3SKd0+ljKCnOTIPftn5kiOUqu251HmjFmiey+0kXfBU HjStqsfCNPBm0rbOfpWARPXvPejcXEj7Z87pscsitGoG7M4C7tmNDtjBquh8M3JKHOOG vGHoFDa0qhQIRHOsJUuwlZIKr6Ah5NeXLbKwvxEE5PHduDhvXytCUAYSxwTwrgP8x711 qHzDf5clvSMkEKv3+Z3+eTPSKqnIczF8aSCpawXGyh4W9bc6IgFCcDLZHj703jYrX72s fQAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=J12GHf3X; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m20si83296ejl.598.2021.06.09.08.16.43; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=J12GHf3X; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232495AbhFINEE (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:04:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59830 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231206AbhFINED (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:04:03 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D443C61108; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:02:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1623243729; bh=HJUj0Zp7HP5Zllx4h5EYuzKlgKy4TSOLM0QRjmLM2rY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=J12GHf3XzR6X0GIw7L++qzGrGor4N3jL6KIp4GQXurdsf+ylcLaP07KW5utk5LRJW /M1ijmE2iw6tGQ+I2sU8hJb3SwDCGIMnDXmycAgp6cRUT2uHHJVIQMdBm10ARwLUak aeoQVIbfpwM7I0uKMsXsdiwI5zLtWqreyExr5f9JgLttcvOFkr21EBcBgkDzT+zA6q QD8UIxeXBNo3d8IOTld0FWT+8snqVaMZFtrl+szcYVU1xEwU6P1JCrkYH/k/J2dANh 4cC0TQGDRnxHZDMBP8GrHHkFdG39+m46pOmIjT9OuT3DYTYCM4a0sCmaBE8Nx0zh4c GN7225lOiK9uA== Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:02:06 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Reinette Chatre Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] selftests/sgx: Migrate to kselftest harness Message-ID: <20210609130206.ezv5flznlb2g6wm7@kernel.org> References: <20210526124740.16783-1-jarkko@kernel.org> <20210526124740.16783-2-jarkko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:35:25AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Hi Jarkko, > > On 5/26/2021 5:47 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > ... > > > - exit(KSFT_PASS); > > +static inline int encl_call(const void *in, void *out, struct sgx_enclave_run *run, bool clobbered) > > +{ > > + void *in2 = (void *)in; > > + int ret; > > -err: > > - encl_delete(&encl); > > - exit(KSFT_FAIL); > > + if (clobbered) > > + ret = vdso_sgx_enter_enclave((unsigned long)in2, (unsigned long)out, 0, > > + EENTER, 0, 0, run); > > + else > > + ret = sgx_enter_enclave(in2, out, 0, EENTER, NULL, NULL, run); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > I find this change unnecessary because it is very specific to the current > test cases and limiting future test cases. From what I understand it > attempts to create a generic "call into the enclave" wrapper but in doing so > it constrains the call to use only two registers, assuming there will always > and only be just an "in" and "out" parameter needed. > > Reinette Thank you, good catch, it should be a macro. I'll turn in such. Other than that, it does not limit anything as we are talking neither API or ABI. /Jarkko