Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753022AbWKFM7k (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:59:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753023AbWKFM7k (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:59:40 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:35561 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753021AbWKFM7j (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:59:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:58:18 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: Jonathan Lemon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Message-ID: <20061106125818.GA20351@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20061103163012.GA84707@cave.trolltruffles.com> <20061105204741.GA1847@elf.ucw.cz> <20061106101329.GA16817@2ka.mipt.ru> <20061106101633.GE2978@elf.ucw.cz> <20061106103724.GA4535@2ka.mipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061106103724.GA4535@2ka.mipt.ru> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 21 Hi! > > Can you explain why kevent is better than kqueue? > > According to my tests kevent is noticebly faster. > It is already too big flag that old system should not be used. > And half of my previous mail to you shows why kevent is better/different > from kqueue. You shown why it is _different_. How much faster is "noticebly faster"? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/