Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5110787pxj; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:21:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0ZtJRsOy84fXlYezrMPIjhhDQDhvMQlCrAvmP4qxH6GbMe3v8GLBDz3JTv0x4Xmvtv5o9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d967:: with SMTP id rp7mr676605ejb.424.1623255678876; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623255678; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x9yZ16DP8xs4YLAze4imGIJSZmef5uChL+TgTf/qXKRuJsJMt8+xNDtfiC9cpmN5R9 ZS9hdpiztjacyKWE0/SrBMDGuvGbrjmEpvGCEy56XBz441XUQm+aBah1bMldjh4a1wul +2ZZOgFUf9VOgE5lUkTg/m9jnUIOgN1gKwvNKaP8UBhQwRSa1YxPh69WT0ZiHqAc7c8C pbwxSgjpyUvKiLG0NM22BljwvyfC8x2Kroa5vjBH97b/4ll6J5K1S8eQcH2g48xTn4kX v4cZ2CeO0O/BqfDyPs33/oxaukuoKMr4qwuH0/wZsX93ZRXiNeRoL7mYMkUJSwZSpIcB rg6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=XMlElETiyD59LovlsrAZ3jNQTFrmc+dshdaSLqPwfGM=; b=WD0oPOL1yOVUr19gi39r74nj/kSQBkXYfY7Xxn2WtSkQQrIyMGlwj64EOHbiOBATa/ pnPWyQzx9wIMIPfhGIkCjshunaiVjKn6hGvOZQ3Z1aXYexqikz6JZ3on12tyPwPCu1CR PtPKHRuUOvNjr5Pae3zucPOhA3RxrkvyGd+KlQvmxl/z3VqxzC0m1ymhw7/PKEM3hLOl 2cT3RtoIr4p8swx6OCZL/P1oqyvCj4L0RIpcF+bQnRw7/4ZQbJ8nKtPYoAPXpdy9k0fa +vHjKmSSbioqSH4cYjIBdiMMP/NgptQe95oIIUnaQe7i7lU6Kpd1FnUBWW+daIk+uUfC O6Bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g26si114229edm.102.2021.06.09.09.20.55; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233799AbhFIPZX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:25:23 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:46421 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232285AbhFIPZW (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:25:22 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-f72.google.com ([209.85.161.72]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lr03C-000053-Bl for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:23:26 +0000 Received: by mail-oo1-f72.google.com with SMTP id o2-20020a4ad4820000b0290208a2516d36so15692466oos.16 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:23:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XMlElETiyD59LovlsrAZ3jNQTFrmc+dshdaSLqPwfGM=; b=m+8zEE4ltV2s+eRVIrE8x7yATCdr/1GGApuehYEnUNtCgXZi/uW833OALKScL04Kkm Btniw2PfiXT1kqIwq1NaUnH4m/sHoIdGvelmeIZ86DmjAbwhuCEGAvPk53O5ET2YDr0H IieoS+QbHUi6Zf651Ca0pppovkEmyTYvfHSy5Ed0BxKsVPIa2UtaX1qQFhXbqk8juGtt IUVeKa/a9W3TM0W0/rRix86oGto8dMJRWXX6kdMvPSkg3AbtlJ1kbte3Dz41bgexss+K 5nk5J3834baZCPiLH5yee7Pk5D8gvpXXGvS4H1DnguupLrs020UL6DEzqXLNDdtug+yG RJWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eQN1a+Gwe0HJiaMcVSoNzMkr55LfjMCK7+qOvuyRlHI1ls6dx I7I7CWbJyuRvfkaYOJeJlkygkanDqpTqpd7iZTlXn6sTebDr3IYhVuVd2drOkYD+vuoWF/+L+3N p2lWOEjhNBzYLc31uh74mgTgLhYcnLiiC0h+qBhB4ketvjCLIRTe5qr0x3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6acb:: with SMTP id m11mr19471682otq.246.1623252204983; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:23:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6acb:: with SMTP id m11mr19471653otq.246.1623252204609; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:23:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210608032207.2923574-1-koba.ko@canonical.com> <84eb168e-58ff-0350-74e2-c55249eb258c@gmail.com> <7a36c032-38fa-6aa6-fa0f-c3664850d8ea@gmail.com> <4508fbcb-f8ec-3805-4aa3-eeea4975de31@gmail.com> <51990dff-79f8-ec25-873d-e5d6be2f923c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51990dff-79f8-ec25-873d-e5d6be2f923c@gmail.com> From: Koba Ko Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 23:23:13 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] r8169: Use PHY_POLL when RTL8106E enable ASPM To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:29 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > > On 09.06.2021 03:47, Koba Ko wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:58 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> > >> On 08.06.2021 16:17, Koba Ko wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:45 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 08.06.2021 12:43, Koba Ko wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:00 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 08.06.2021 05:22, Koba Ko wrote: > >>>>>>> For RTL8106E, it's a Fast-ethernet chip. > >>>>>>> If ASPM is enabled, the link chang interrupt wouldn't be triggered > >>>>>>> immediately and must wait a very long time to get link change interrupt. > >>>>>>> Even the link change interrupt isn't triggered, the phy link is already > >>>>>>> established. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Use PHY_POLL to watch the status of phy link and disable > >>>>>>> the link change interrupt when ASPM is enabled on RTL8106E. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> v2: Instead use PHY_POLL and identify 8106E by RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Still the issue description doesn't convince me that it's a hw bug > >>>>>> with the respective chip version. What has been stated so far: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. (and most important) Issue doesn't occur in mainline because ASPM > >>>>>> is disabled in mainline for r8169. Issue occurs only with a > >>>>>> downstream kernel with ASPM enabled for r8169. > >>>>> > >>>>> mainline kernel and enable L1, the issue is also observed. > >>>>> > >>>> Yes, but enabling L1 via sysfs is at own risk. > >>> > >>> but we could have a workaround if hw have an aspm issue. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>>> 2. Issue occurs only with ASPM L1.1 not disabled, even though this chip > >>>>>> version doesn't support L1 sub-states. Just L0s/L1 don't trigger > >>>>>> the issue. > >>>>>> The NIC doesn't announce L1.1 support, therefore PCI core won't > >>>>>> enable L1 sub-states on the PCIe link between NIC and upstream > >>>>>> PCI bridge. > >>>>> > >>>>> More precisely, when L1 is enabled, the issue would be triggered. > >>>>> For RTL8106E, > >>>>> 1. Only disable L0s, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered. > >>>>> 2. Only disable L1_1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered. > >>>>> > >>>>> 3. Only disable L1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 0, issue is not triggered. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 3. Issue occurs only with a GBit-capable link partner. 100MBit link > >>>>>> partners are fine. Not clear whether issue occurs with a specific > >>>>>> Gbit link partner only or with GBit-capable link partners in general. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 4. Only link-up interrupt is affected. Not link-down and not interrupts > >>>>>> triggered by other interrupt sources. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 5. Realtek couldn't confirm that there's such a hw bug on RTL8106e. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> One thing that hasn't been asked yet: > >>>>>> Does issue occur always if you re-plug the cable? Or only on boot? > >>>>>> I'm asking because in the dmesg log you attached to the bugzilla issue > >>>>>> the following looks totally ok. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 61.651643] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down > >>>>>> [ 63.720015] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > >>>>>> [ 66.685499] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down > >>>>> > >>>>> Once the link is up, > >>>>> 1. If cable is unplug&plug immediately, you wouldn't see the issue. > >>>>> 2. Unplug cable and wait a long time (~1Mins), then plug the cable, > >>>>> the issue appears again. > >>>>> > >>>> This sounds runtime-pm-related. After 10s the NIC runtime-suspends, > >>>> and once the cable is re-plugged a PME is triggered that lets the > >>>> PCI core return the PCIe link from D3hot to D0. > >>>> If you re-plug the cable after such a longer time, do you see the > >>>> PCIe PME immediately in /proc/interrupts? > >>> > >>> I don't know which irq number is for RTL8106e PME, but check all PME > >>> in /proc/interrupt, > >>> > >>> There's no interrupt increase on all PME entries and rtl8106e irq entry(irq 32). > >>> > >>>> > >>>> And if you set /sys/class/net//power/control to "on", does the > >>>> issue still occur? > >>> > >>> Yes, after echo "on" to /sys/class/net//power/control and > >>> replugging the cable, the issue is still caught. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koba Ko > >>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > >>>>>>> index 2c89cde7da1e..a59cbaef2839 100644 > >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > >>>>>>> @@ -4914,6 +4914,19 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rtl8169_pm_ops = { > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +static int rtl_phy_poll_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>> +{ > >>>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = tp->pci_dev; > >>>>>>> + > >>>>>>> + if (!pcie_aspm_enabled(pdev)) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's the wrong call. According to what you said earlier you want to > >>>>>> check for L1 sub-states, not for ASPM in general. > >>>>> > >>>>> As per described above, that's why use pcie_aspm_enabled here. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> + return 0; > >>>>>>> + > >>>>>>> + if (tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39) > >>>>>>> + return 1; > >>>>>>> + > >>>>>>> + return 0; > >>>>>>> +} > >>>>>>> + > >>>>>>> static void rtl_wol_shutdown_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>> { > >>>>>>> /* WoL fails with 8168b when the receiver is disabled. */ > >>>>>>> @@ -4991,7 +5004,10 @@ static const struct net_device_ops rtl_netdev_ops = { > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> static void rtl_set_irq_mask(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>> { > >>>>>>> - tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr | LinkChg; > >>>>>>> + tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr; > >>>>>>> + > >>>>>>> + if (!rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp)) > >>>>>>> + tp->irq_mask |= LinkChg; > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> if (tp->mac_version <= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_06) > >>>>>>> tp->irq_mask |= SYSErr | RxOverflow | RxFIFOOver; > >>>>>>> @@ -5085,7 +5101,8 @@ static int r8169_mdio_register(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>> new_bus->name = "r8169"; > >>>>>>> new_bus->priv = tp; > >>>>>>> new_bus->parent = &pdev->dev; > >>>>>>> - new_bus->irq[0] = PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT; > >>>>>>> + new_bus->irq[0] = > >>>>>>> + (rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp) ? PHY_POLL : PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT); > >>>>>>> snprintf(new_bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "r8169-%x", pci_dev_id(pdev)); > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> new_bus->read = r8169_mdio_read_reg; > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> The r8101 vendor driver applies a special setting for RTL8106e if ASPM is enabled. > >> Not sure whether it's related but it's worth a try. Could you please check whether > >> the following makes a difference? > > > > After applying this patch, it can't help relieve the issue. > > The 8101 vendor driver also use polling method to watch the link change event. > > Tried to disable polling method and enable LinkChg Irq, but it also > > can't get LinkChg interrupt. > > > OK, thanks for testing. > As it is now, rtl_phy_poll_quirk() would always return false because ASPM > is disabled on driver load. Changing ASPM settings can be done later via sysfs > if supported by device and upstream bridge. In addition: it seems a callback is needed to inform the driver when changing the aspm policy, is it correct? > - If you want to return a bool, declare the return value as bool. > - You shouldn't have to disable the LinkChg interrupt. The interrupt just triggers > a phylib state machine run what may result in a faster link-up signal even > when using polling. ok. > > By the way: All Realtek vendor drivers (r8101, r8168, r8125) don't use the LinkChg > interrupt. However I don't think this is because of known hw issues, more likely > it's because they don't use phylib and thought polling is the easier approach. > At least for r8169 I haven't heard yet of any complain regarding the LinkChg > interrupt. > > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c > >> index 50f0f621b..60014b9c4 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c > >> @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static void rtl8106e_hw_phy_config(struct rtl8169_private *tp, > >> r8169_apply_firmware(tp); > >> > >> rtl_writephy_batch(phydev, phy_reg_init); > >> + phy_write(phydev, 0x18, 0x8310); > >> } > >> > >> static void rtl8125_legacy_force_mode(struct phy_device *phydev) > >> -- > >> 2.32.0 > >> > >> >