Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, 3/4] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add component RDMA4
To:     Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
        Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
        Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
References: <1618236288-1617-1-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
 <1618236288-1617-4-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a1824cdc-7e2f-a38f-d019-e1d8f92ead2b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:43:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1618236288-1617-4-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 12/04/2021 16:04, Yongqiang Niu wrote:
> This patch add component RDMA4
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> index 7718cd6..4bba275 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA2,
> +	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA4,

Pach 1-3 looks good, but could be squashed in one patch. Please try to come up
with a more descriptive commit message. Rule of thumb is to explain why we need
a patch not what the patch does.

Regards,
Matthias

>  	DDP_COMPONENT_UFOE,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA0,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA1,
>