Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <3328306a4d5b4f8f58b3b8666eeccac714440da8.camel@svanheule.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: mdio: Reject invalid clause-22 addresses
From:   Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:51:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20210607110355.GA5705@sirena.org.uk>
References: <cover.1622743333.git.sander@svanheule.net>
         <20210605083116.12786-1-sander@svanheule.net>
         <20210607110355.GA5705@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mark,

On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 12:03 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > Currently a regmap configuration for regmap-mdio must have a register
> > address width of 5 bits (cf. clause-22 register access). This is not
> > enforced on the provided register addresses, which would enable
> > clause-45 MDIO bus access, if the right bit packing is used.
> 
> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> it hard to follow what's going on and what the current state of things
> is and makes it easy for things to get missed when threads get cleaned
> out.

It appears that this has caused you to merge the RFC patches instead. I've
posted two new patches, to bring the code in line with the discussion on the
original RFC patches. See:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1623238313.git.sander@svanheule.net/

My apologies for the extra work this has caused.

Best,
Sander