Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5155598pxj; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:22:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6DEG6DIy3pMZU+BoHNWadi7gbt2qxAx2Mj3c7kyEY3DFw9qcIp6xIcBkRoThFiqGUEHE8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b82:: with SMTP id cf2mr487332edb.351.1623259335606; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:22:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623259335; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0FCgY3nhgEDECXVT2aPw7AAi+wORXMDSyJOrg20u59akzS8SQ5xov5pHTsix6/Efpq HMZMadBDTJHPdH/fjm41b5d8zvk2T9Z7VJyS0btRtyb3y6eouxcy92vGvKQNKHRQOUsg 9O9AHqwc5A3CHOoK3nGUEBvbLtfBr3/6XUQZU5FzVj2Ugbel5kNHGjfcjjQaZNURxaQL vO0gkwzfl/8rgvOiPp3sNIly9xfqrgKSDRFNAm04/Lq/xC5OowHjMLC6BmHsl8NIEvZU au9zFNc+ryCESWfjtgkOCX6ZdMc3kmQyQwZPBahWq3aRH509lC+hNueYFfOckVgd+6v9 SmlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ViVPGoGxrSIkGgoTe+oNnY8z9x08KjhHWnY3SCoPDKM=; b=fEurASZ//BPEqQrE/MTJaE6s3EP8qqSm8/Df05AQ9itaY9JmqMd3f/h6uca/nBQmwd b2t5ZeDscu9W+7TMPN6Qhhfu7USYEMmLhfrmBcolERYxHSW0k4fE56YiPXQCu89la4FA mYwXiCQF/F53nPXa/iEcOkK/JJJzLtExFKUotuMP7IsCRgqjX/z/iiAnTsi5Qm9MSJDW TzZ82e69jcoDgxwQ8rlqvQpqbtzKw6bPmukXQSrMrxowd33W+VJxr+DZplRQO/XS1kRV kpi/7tWOsahNLixFsiyXnGKlTkH5DXJnb/n8qtQXBqFF3iw0IAr23qtFRyaNglzJhHye zfkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=U5+jSkqJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t6si253577eju.144.2021.06.09.10.21.51; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=U5+jSkqJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239037AbhFILz7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:55:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55318 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231612AbhFILz5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:55:57 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C70296100B; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:54:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1623239643; bh=B2VGGA/Njpagy/zTT2ydH2UN3O5PEQtkbmNoWUl0Ny0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=U5+jSkqJM0u5bFGSzIbpT77QtTxILy1RtAkdAqjRcII2YuxGQo4sYJly7ct8Ec266 N1H0K+aVJsORPozfP6LJJ3JafTbL9o7TeWDhEqRHrt+4gdKO2/0isbqXLj7JJUnsNq O6iSx3dIg2jUcC51pYmv/zt0rgewO3PTRRZDduG4t90HdVpRCKpwvi2Kt4jfY8VIwX sDsxv8Ya01tJIhN2pVb6U1hu38lNXmqdPUTXoaWU5WhmlDmsJyOXcNhatr4lPbviBe 7SnVUPq5IFPRsEmkoWiJlZyfP6FVWcYPA/3zL+wpntj2Xsm29a8eqCtew2GzggT9Pb p79jwyuCPQlow== Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:54:00 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , "Eric W . Biederman" , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] posix-cpu-timers: Fix rearm racing against process tick Message-ID: <20210609115400.GD104634@lothringen> References: <20210604113159.26177-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20210604113159.26177-2-frederic@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210604113159.26177-2-frederic@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 01:31:54PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Since the process wide cputime counter is started locklessly from > posix_cpu_timer_rearm(), it can be concurrently stopped by operations > on other timers from the same thread group, such as in the following > unlucky scenario: > > CPU 0 CPU 1 > ----- ----- > timer_settime(TIMER B) > posix_cpu_timer_rearm(TIMER A) > cpu_clock_sample_group() > (pct->timers_active already true) > > handle_posix_cpu_timers() > check_process_timers() > stop_process_timers() > pct->timers_active = false > arm_timer(TIMER A) > > tick -> run_posix_cpu_timers() > // sees !pct->timers_active, ignore > // our TIMER A > > Fix this with simply locking process wide cputime counting start and > timer arm in the same block. > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Eric W. Biederman Fixes: 60f2ceaa8111 ("posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org