Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp226542pxj; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:12:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyr2kcVq0znML6qOb5XkKjKOPrKrUwTogWnQ+9Ye8jT0ZmDN9a9ztLke8UzGyHZGMbRYjN6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a890:: with SMTP id ha16mr2709619ejb.159.1623301959179; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 22:12:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623301959; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k4m1h339WfhIwJROqq6tSc5fHkP97AQ7BoBRX64HxFUEQbxypBEtIWW7iBhaEQO2Lv KOa7uv3F2uvcvqUShRA+955tLZO/Vjo7G45x5QoO6JEKtb/ozEiXWjw7Or58OtqUS7IP ZPRmnUNBk9gIq+b9c0QNC42NQaFT0UNYQFYAn+hmmIhXMcXKXt7S9ImkqP941o3ANf3G 82tSyrcQcE2Dl6c7FaYQxVOqAFSLbd1FrWD0eHCH2JXSWaUn2xmAVWnZtvU+e8xMJ4+6 7HQdLqkZ5OYAlPXbYDLk64AahqInN/8Pp0Vg2sP3pw9ySsT1MY0u68474RoYdQpdrVDV hjAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=kIadsDavK1OeX9U94Nnx1M8zsVqP63T1U+UuXS2of+M=; b=b4qckjk1EmCib8T0BLejO7tvkbmSNcPHvzd54YU6thamPqlfpcfY+bAKzaP1tHAiO7 ya0tnrevm5yRz4BOV43PRTkJrgX4xrX0h2b5lq6wmYjCwFIODf5uiEGrPEUkRJ348zU5 AppHJ2hUdoDZiMFdr4QTKA5CPqSpBbhlO61V2dFIVFzyN+hy8eIPjuhxYGRhznAM0vmK b2thUP2yXNXqYJP76IorYh8b+U7Nt3aXUF4JbS01md4+MH93W6DxYuwR6LAwz7pfNCQT llmCvmlCuC7QBHpqip+Q1YcO0pw2qv1dM8q6bDpQMJP8o0bfbu2an+zjvkKE1IRwODl2 aRZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v16si1370548ejg.147.2021.06.09.22.12.15; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 22:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230052AbhFJFMI (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:12:08 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:37972 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229634AbhFJFMI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:12:08 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f199.google.com ([209.85.167.199]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lrCxG-0005Os-6m for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:10:10 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f199.google.com with SMTP id l1-20020a5441010000b02901ecd2ee1861so461332oic.13 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 22:10:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kIadsDavK1OeX9U94Nnx1M8zsVqP63T1U+UuXS2of+M=; b=O29jqrTuFuWSWqhvQ0LKlbM3BFCixjtKnNTi+1eRKvu856IyWE/kJH2vmXHGvMILFC Gw4BWHLnmPZ3lEZW3SmjYfzMwfe2DZxExKXKVgJdZE3mu+cK+m6/kfrAeQSwNxeCzcE0 YUOMtCy5kDvrqQqeNVpyqzMOys4ls0FkShN7LFD4fUP5EO9yc4klkPHAj2LsZ7b+1pjO 7ielv+7xQ664UGq9PSAufOSv+KCOfj53IdXEz1wAamxSRX0SA3qU2jlePQazp/Jgm4xO u7vUX4kSYB3Vty0XkeBe5aitPKPTDUWXBeIuTneTUYmHw0c4JFvUsN2n/Dig8Pj4qtcI LcbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/5k7VpJbAH/2U/8hsTNC6XWfou8Ghtspa2Jdrtp/ryQN+9F3i 6O7Uba1iltZ8JLpF8shw6+ncYuDK9GXIyPiJRYB7SDP7mz1mZN0t92tyjD80FxyclkU1JmrxTUC EpxYJJhqHR9joZe0DrboOOn5axL3ujJRd3QrOmhcS+9/kb22IlYCXkK5DeA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:b843:: with SMTP id i64mr971344oif.139.1623301808888; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 22:10:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:b843:: with SMTP id i64mr971327oif.139.1623301808481; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 22:10:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210608032207.2923574-1-koba.ko@canonical.com> <84eb168e-58ff-0350-74e2-c55249eb258c@gmail.com> <7a36c032-38fa-6aa6-fa0f-c3664850d8ea@gmail.com> <4508fbcb-f8ec-3805-4aa3-eeea4975de31@gmail.com> <51990dff-79f8-ec25-873d-e5d6be2f923c@gmail.com> <475c252b-c560-c8ab-9504-50c036ee7d85@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <475c252b-c560-c8ab-9504-50c036ee7d85@gmail.com> From: Koba Ko Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:09:57 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] r8169: Use PHY_POLL when RTL8106E enable ASPM To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:12 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > > On 09.06.2021 17:23, Koba Ko wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:29 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> > >> On 09.06.2021 03:47, Koba Ko wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:58 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 08.06.2021 16:17, Koba Ko wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:45 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 08.06.2021 12:43, Koba Ko wrote: > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:00 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 08.06.2021 05:22, Koba Ko wrote: > >>>>>>>>> For RTL8106E, it's a Fast-ethernet chip. > >>>>>>>>> If ASPM is enabled, the link chang interrupt wouldn't be triggered > >>>>>>>>> immediately and must wait a very long time to get link change interrupt. > >>>>>>>>> Even the link change interrupt isn't triggered, the phy link is already > >>>>>>>>> established. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Use PHY_POLL to watch the status of phy link and disable > >>>>>>>>> the link change interrupt when ASPM is enabled on RTL8106E. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> v2: Instead use PHY_POLL and identify 8106E by RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Still the issue description doesn't convince me that it's a hw bug > >>>>>>>> with the respective chip version. What has been stated so far: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. (and most important) Issue doesn't occur in mainline because ASPM > >>>>>>>> is disabled in mainline for r8169. Issue occurs only with a > >>>>>>>> downstream kernel with ASPM enabled for r8169. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> mainline kernel and enable L1, the issue is also observed. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, but enabling L1 via sysfs is at own risk. > >>>>> > >>>>> but we could have a workaround if hw have an aspm issue. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2. Issue occurs only with ASPM L1.1 not disabled, even though this chip > >>>>>>>> version doesn't support L1 sub-states. Just L0s/L1 don't trigger > >>>>>>>> the issue. > >>>>>>>> The NIC doesn't announce L1.1 support, therefore PCI core won't > >>>>>>>> enable L1 sub-states on the PCIe link between NIC and upstream > >>>>>>>> PCI bridge. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> More precisely, when L1 is enabled, the issue would be triggered. > >>>>>>> For RTL8106E, > >>>>>>> 1. Only disable L0s, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered. > >>>>>>> 2. Only disable L1_1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 3. Only disable L1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 0, issue is not triggered. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 3. Issue occurs only with a GBit-capable link partner. 100MBit link > >>>>>>>> partners are fine. Not clear whether issue occurs with a specific > >>>>>>>> Gbit link partner only or with GBit-capable link partners in general. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 4. Only link-up interrupt is affected. Not link-down and not interrupts > >>>>>>>> triggered by other interrupt sources. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 5. Realtek couldn't confirm that there's such a hw bug on RTL8106e. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One thing that hasn't been asked yet: > >>>>>>>> Does issue occur always if you re-plug the cable? Or only on boot? > >>>>>>>> I'm asking because in the dmesg log you attached to the bugzilla issue > >>>>>>>> the following looks totally ok. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [ 61.651643] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down > >>>>>>>> [ 63.720015] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > >>>>>>>> [ 66.685499] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Once the link is up, > >>>>>>> 1. If cable is unplug&plug immediately, you wouldn't see the issue. > >>>>>>> 2. Unplug cable and wait a long time (~1Mins), then plug the cable, > >>>>>>> the issue appears again. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> This sounds runtime-pm-related. After 10s the NIC runtime-suspends, > >>>>>> and once the cable is re-plugged a PME is triggered that lets the > >>>>>> PCI core return the PCIe link from D3hot to D0. > >>>>>> If you re-plug the cable after such a longer time, do you see the > >>>>>> PCIe PME immediately in /proc/interrupts? > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know which irq number is for RTL8106e PME, but check all PME > >>>>> in /proc/interrupt, > >>>>> > >>>>> There's no interrupt increase on all PME entries and rtl8106e irq entry(irq 32). > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And if you set /sys/class/net//power/control to "on", does the > >>>>>> issue still occur? > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, after echo "on" to /sys/class/net//power/control and > >>>>> replugging the cable, the issue is still caught. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koba Ko > >>>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > >>>>>>>>> index 2c89cde7da1e..a59cbaef2839 100644 > >>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > >>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > >>>>>>>>> @@ -4914,6 +4914,19 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rtl8169_pm_ops = { > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +static int rtl_phy_poll_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>>>> +{ > >>>>>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = tp->pci_dev; > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + if (!pcie_aspm_enabled(pdev)) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> That's the wrong call. According to what you said earlier you want to > >>>>>>>> check for L1 sub-states, not for ASPM in general. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As per described above, that's why use pcie_aspm_enabled here. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> + return 0; > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + if (tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39) > >>>>>>>>> + return 1; > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + return 0; > >>>>>>>>> +} > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> static void rtl_wol_shutdown_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>>>> { > >>>>>>>>> /* WoL fails with 8168b when the receiver is disabled. */ > >>>>>>>>> @@ -4991,7 +5004,10 @@ static const struct net_device_ops rtl_netdev_ops = { > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> static void rtl_set_irq_mask(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>>>> { > >>>>>>>>> - tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr | LinkChg; > >>>>>>>>> + tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr; > >>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>> + if (!rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp)) > >>>>>>>>> + tp->irq_mask |= LinkChg; > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> if (tp->mac_version <= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_06) > >>>>>>>>> tp->irq_mask |= SYSErr | RxOverflow | RxFIFOOver; > >>>>>>>>> @@ -5085,7 +5101,8 @@ static int r8169_mdio_register(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > >>>>>>>>> new_bus->name = "r8169"; > >>>>>>>>> new_bus->priv = tp; > >>>>>>>>> new_bus->parent = &pdev->dev; > >>>>>>>>> - new_bus->irq[0] = PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT; > >>>>>>>>> + new_bus->irq[0] = > >>>>>>>>> + (rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp) ? PHY_POLL : PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT); > >>>>>>>>> snprintf(new_bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "r8169-%x", pci_dev_id(pdev)); > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> new_bus->read = r8169_mdio_read_reg; > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> The r8101 vendor driver applies a special setting for RTL8106e if ASPM is enabled. > >>>> Not sure whether it's related but it's worth a try. Could you please check whether > >>>> the following makes a difference? > >>> > >>> After applying this patch, it can't help relieve the issue. > >>> The 8101 vendor driver also use polling method to watch the link change event. > >>> Tried to disable polling method and enable LinkChg Irq, but it also > >>> can't get LinkChg interrupt. > >>> > >> OK, thanks for testing. > >> As it is now, rtl_phy_poll_quirk() would always return false because ASPM > >> is disabled on driver load. Changing ASPM settings can be done later via sysfs > >> if supported by device and upstream bridge. In addition: > > > > it seems a callback is needed to inform the driver when changing the > > aspm policy, > > is it correct? > > > It's not the policy that changes when writing to the link attributes. > See aspm_attr_store_common(), it modifies link->aspm_disable and calls > pcie_config_aspm_link(). Having said that there is no such callback. > All that could be done is switching to polling for this chip version > unconditionally. > > One more thing you could try is the following. The PCIe link will > have L1 support enabled, but the NIC won't actively trigger it. > This should be sufficient for the system to reach higher PC package > power saving states. After applying this patch, the issue can't be got. I also tried to call rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(tp, false); on rtl8169h/8111h on intel platform. the machine could go deeper to pc10. After tried this patch, I still think there's a hw issue on ASPM for rtl8106e. How do you think which next step is better? Im very appreciate your effort. Thanks > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > index b923958af..be162d2f5 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c > @@ -3510,7 +3510,6 @@ static void rtl_hw_start_8106(struct rtl8169_private *tp) > rtl_eri_write(tp, 0x1b0, ERIAR_MASK_0011, 0x0000); > > rtl_pcie_state_l2l3_disable(tp); > - rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(tp, true); > } > > DECLARE_RTL_COND(rtl_mac_ocp_e00e_cond) > -- > 2.32.0 > > > > > >> - If you want to return a bool, declare the return value as bool. > >> - You shouldn't have to disable the LinkChg interrupt. The interrupt just triggers > >> a phylib state machine run what may result in a faster link-up signal even > >> when using polling. > > > > ok. > > > >> > >> By the way: All Realtek vendor drivers (r8101, r8168, r8125) don't use the LinkChg > >> interrupt. However I don't think this is because of known hw issues, more likely > >> it's because they don't use phylib and thought polling is the easier approach. > >> At least for r8169 I haven't heard yet of any complain regarding the LinkChg > >> interrupt. > >> > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c > >>>> index 50f0f621b..60014b9c4 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c > >>>> @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static void rtl8106e_hw_phy_config(struct rtl8169_private *tp, > >>>> r8169_apply_firmware(tp); > >>>> > >>>> rtl_writephy_batch(phydev, phy_reg_init); > >>>> + phy_write(phydev, 0x18, 0x8310); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> static void rtl8125_legacy_force_mode(struct phy_device *phydev) > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.32.0 > >>>> > >>>> > >> >