Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp382855pxj; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:13:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZZqEuxdusOwWz0hcA84o4nB3EogNxcUPweJiHViU7RQ7QLuJaenOknw5zq/yQAwIgpffU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4308:: with SMTP id j8mr3757071ejm.315.1623319988956; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:13:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623319988; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sSKbUED1iHLSpE9+UEvdhwtdVUwS9ewF9s6Ji5hOjgtetGSF6kAFFy0/tB5P3QObNS uk9LQkIi1gg1l13vo9kU1o/JgTZo7rOzBlz3CXeGDaVCyezYor+Q23KMpR/CAIsafPyR j5sdK3iv10JXq3JOCDXd7eq061F2UH6YRClFFYewPZloNvHpuj01DKXP9Pg1Sx29ID6J SspHx++RKESIOwnsdkLR9Ykf/3dxPQ2Zy3/SOSCaU/fwL/CQ18Yn7au5sdwciIicT/5K F0dXnJNgBAgMqHtM0gEPy07Kc77G1DFvwtXWxpnPna9HZJyKF9LJHDmANrDi5Ud1F7QB w9ZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from :references:cc:to:dkim-signature; bh=CHEp2pkwfW0eB4B6m2/CXkN7m3ojeZmSm0DxpaYvedo=; b=hK5D+PaMr7nvj2onDgKTXVxnIjo8skFc4xwyfjmpFZEo4QVErwT6KhBpcKfyNyNRl4 PMTnNM4HEqmRZ9cLbp2Nv44bMkKp2C6vZc8BtJPTKIOAcWrjs+LtyiORVV0QGMRzLI/Y cCWD/UfAspbqIAQaAT/Gs2Y9usVbH7ZliVckojajYBJ35OhRkik3sy+R3AlkKlH70kI/ n+KxVNTcU39q/Go3g3ECf5L/Hlh81N5q8U/D28/iWt/CuwidK+roZiR6TdpKPfxnmJ8E 90IWN+8Tq5I7i0zIHK7KpEAzv+aCJoThAzss6Dglw7LfkjT9AE8yLxzYcRh+QPi9BDPG 8y7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AohRUdq1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id de26si2052853ejc.6.2021.06.10.03.12.44; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AohRUdq1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229979AbhFJKNk (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:13:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229770AbhFJKNf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:13:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC9EC061574; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:11:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id m18so1620312wrv.2; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:11:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CHEp2pkwfW0eB4B6m2/CXkN7m3ojeZmSm0DxpaYvedo=; b=AohRUdq1aHrYlbQZyxWQTf331mlMV68KD2v5s38Dp5lAN7WUTgJ43jQxK2DKURi0XS W2Me+rBjRQetqyX0V7dCHhoUTrleDIgb4Y442BDAMygCSf8nYCW0Byx2943olL4T8DxU aJds01WfaJUbRa4x654GhqgBccP/LiuFLZ3p263Teu27S80AH0hAOvaa5PB6/ERCMCRB g49Nvs0/8NvgsFNKMCmgm+yZTZUQklZmOBmEnEFZ0heb51t4sAijkZm36B9H1rACLh53 lC/H3n386zNh7kFV+I6CcK8P+mmD3/6uASJMxIydJEVBFY6kCboV+vWXzs5Dte6GYDkV BtHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CHEp2pkwfW0eB4B6m2/CXkN7m3ojeZmSm0DxpaYvedo=; b=oavdeTuvdNudRKKP0WdhUmvIZLmL1R1GVbJ8UGpFOkPYZchf1glVzOcEM8iDPUd8DY Xw7fw6jx/kykRBVjOZcxH2v1AT/IzJRfHWSqjq5zaX5ZGdsiKrFm+2nMRDUyzOI8fHeF XtK37KagjAyjwKOeJW/9X2u5fmP5+CGnJjmnum816siByVj5thHjuqZ7Vokxg07/Zs6R 2p/eyiz95ErOF7F1VdzDp2NyxEBXStVnBbhBwX7r0ytGiIVPKqJKNMn19wqv5j9v1UzG XLTGUpq7/r2ps5OZL7ptT39ka/pZiOPCopAZY9NtgacwOPYUNUEZP3G8vl+37WVKr7KL s8sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531egcStPLJ3i/Wgj3+nP1HGY+YChGh+ZwkoGJxetFsarXo1xLUc dS+e7jZ9LDDcw2TN5HMjx5IuNHwYcgU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f842:: with SMTP id d2mr4502198wrq.52.1623319894421; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ea:8f29:3800:5520:3253:1d69:c5b4? (p200300ea8f293800552032531d69c5b4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ea:8f29:3800:5520:3253:1d69:c5b4]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q3sm2966737wrr.43.2021.06.10.03.11.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:11:33 -0700 (PDT) To: Koba Ko Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20210608032207.2923574-1-koba.ko@canonical.com> <84eb168e-58ff-0350-74e2-c55249eb258c@gmail.com> <7a36c032-38fa-6aa6-fa0f-c3664850d8ea@gmail.com> <4508fbcb-f8ec-3805-4aa3-eeea4975de31@gmail.com> <51990dff-79f8-ec25-873d-e5d6be2f923c@gmail.com> <475c252b-c560-c8ab-9504-50c036ee7d85@gmail.com> From: Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] r8169: Use PHY_POLL when RTL8106E enable ASPM Message-ID: <1b35b4ac-05a4-9a53-184b-33d2be20af58@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:11:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10.06.2021 07:09, Koba Ko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:12 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> >> On 09.06.2021 17:23, Koba Ko wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:29 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>>> >>>> On 09.06.2021 03:47, Koba Ko wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:58 AM Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08.06.2021 16:17, Koba Ko wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:45 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 08.06.2021 12:43, Koba Ko wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:00 PM Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 08.06.2021 05:22, Koba Ko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> For RTL8106E, it's a Fast-ethernet chip. >>>>>>>>>>> If ASPM is enabled, the link chang interrupt wouldn't be triggered >>>>>>>>>>> immediately and must wait a very long time to get link change interrupt. >>>>>>>>>>> Even the link change interrupt isn't triggered, the phy link is already >>>>>>>>>>> established. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Use PHY_POLL to watch the status of phy link and disable >>>>>>>>>>> the link change interrupt when ASPM is enabled on RTL8106E. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> v2: Instead use PHY_POLL and identify 8106E by RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Still the issue description doesn't convince me that it's a hw bug >>>>>>>>>> with the respective chip version. What has been stated so far: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1. (and most important) Issue doesn't occur in mainline because ASPM >>>>>>>>>> is disabled in mainline for r8169. Issue occurs only with a >>>>>>>>>> downstream kernel with ASPM enabled for r8169. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mainline kernel and enable L1, the issue is also observed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, but enabling L1 via sysfs is at own risk. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but we could have a workaround if hw have an aspm issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2. Issue occurs only with ASPM L1.1 not disabled, even though this chip >>>>>>>>>> version doesn't support L1 sub-states. Just L0s/L1 don't trigger >>>>>>>>>> the issue. >>>>>>>>>> The NIC doesn't announce L1.1 support, therefore PCI core won't >>>>>>>>>> enable L1 sub-states on the PCIe link between NIC and upstream >>>>>>>>>> PCI bridge. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More precisely, when L1 is enabled, the issue would be triggered. >>>>>>>>> For RTL8106E, >>>>>>>>> 1. Only disable L0s, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered. >>>>>>>>> 2. Only disable L1_1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 1, issue is triggered. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 3. Only disable L1, pcie_aspm_enabled return 0, issue is not triggered. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 3. Issue occurs only with a GBit-capable link partner. 100MBit link >>>>>>>>>> partners are fine. Not clear whether issue occurs with a specific >>>>>>>>>> Gbit link partner only or with GBit-capable link partners in general. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 4. Only link-up interrupt is affected. Not link-down and not interrupts >>>>>>>>>> triggered by other interrupt sources. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 5. Realtek couldn't confirm that there's such a hw bug on RTL8106e. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> One thing that hasn't been asked yet: >>>>>>>>>> Does issue occur always if you re-plug the cable? Or only on boot? >>>>>>>>>> I'm asking because in the dmesg log you attached to the bugzilla issue >>>>>>>>>> the following looks totally ok. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ 61.651643] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down >>>>>>>>>> [ 63.720015] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx >>>>>>>>>> [ 66.685499] r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: Link is Down >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once the link is up, >>>>>>>>> 1. If cable is unplug&plug immediately, you wouldn't see the issue. >>>>>>>>> 2. Unplug cable and wait a long time (~1Mins), then plug the cable, >>>>>>>>> the issue appears again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This sounds runtime-pm-related. After 10s the NIC runtime-suspends, >>>>>>>> and once the cable is re-plugged a PME is triggered that lets the >>>>>>>> PCI core return the PCIe link from D3hot to D0. >>>>>>>> If you re-plug the cable after such a longer time, do you see the >>>>>>>> PCIe PME immediately in /proc/interrupts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know which irq number is for RTL8106e PME, but check all PME >>>>>>> in /proc/interrupt, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's no interrupt increase on all PME entries and rtl8106e irq entry(irq 32). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And if you set /sys/class/net//power/control to "on", does the >>>>>>>> issue still occur? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, after echo "on" to /sys/class/net//power/control and >>>>>>> replugging the cable, the issue is still caught. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koba Ko >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c >>>>>>>>>>> index 2c89cde7da1e..a59cbaef2839 100644 >>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c >>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -4914,6 +4914,19 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rtl8169_pm_ops = { >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +static int rtl_phy_poll_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp) >>>>>>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = tp->pci_dev; >>>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>>> + if (!pcie_aspm_enabled(pdev)) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's the wrong call. According to what you said earlier you want to >>>>>>>>>> check for L1 sub-states, not for ASPM in general. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As per described above, that's why use pcie_aspm_enabled here. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> + return 0; >>>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>>> + if (tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_39) >>>>>>>>>>> + return 1; >>>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>>> + return 0; >>>>>>>>>>> +} >>>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>>> static void rtl_wol_shutdown_quirk(struct rtl8169_private *tp) >>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>> /* WoL fails with 8168b when the receiver is disabled. */ >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -4991,7 +5004,10 @@ static const struct net_device_ops rtl_netdev_ops = { >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> static void rtl_set_irq_mask(struct rtl8169_private *tp) >>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>> - tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr | LinkChg; >>>>>>>>>>> + tp->irq_mask = RxOK | RxErr | TxOK | TxErr; >>>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>>> + if (!rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp)) >>>>>>>>>>> + tp->irq_mask |= LinkChg; >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> if (tp->mac_version <= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_06) >>>>>>>>>>> tp->irq_mask |= SYSErr | RxOverflow | RxFIFOOver; >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -5085,7 +5101,8 @@ static int r8169_mdio_register(struct rtl8169_private *tp) >>>>>>>>>>> new_bus->name = "r8169"; >>>>>>>>>>> new_bus->priv = tp; >>>>>>>>>>> new_bus->parent = &pdev->dev; >>>>>>>>>>> - new_bus->irq[0] = PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT; >>>>>>>>>>> + new_bus->irq[0] = >>>>>>>>>>> + (rtl_phy_poll_quirk(tp) ? PHY_POLL : PHY_MAC_INTERRUPT); >>>>>>>>>>> snprintf(new_bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "r8169-%x", pci_dev_id(pdev)); >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> new_bus->read = r8169_mdio_read_reg; >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The r8101 vendor driver applies a special setting for RTL8106e if ASPM is enabled. >>>>>> Not sure whether it's related but it's worth a try. Could you please check whether >>>>>> the following makes a difference? >>>>> >>>>> After applying this patch, it can't help relieve the issue. >>>>> The 8101 vendor driver also use polling method to watch the link change event. >>>>> Tried to disable polling method and enable LinkChg Irq, but it also >>>>> can't get LinkChg interrupt. >>>>> >>>> OK, thanks for testing. >>>> As it is now, rtl_phy_poll_quirk() would always return false because ASPM >>>> is disabled on driver load. Changing ASPM settings can be done later via sysfs >>>> if supported by device and upstream bridge. In addition: >>> >>> it seems a callback is needed to inform the driver when changing the >>> aspm policy, >>> is it correct? >>> >> It's not the policy that changes when writing to the link attributes. >> See aspm_attr_store_common(), it modifies link->aspm_disable and calls >> pcie_config_aspm_link(). Having said that there is no such callback. >> All that could be done is switching to polling for this chip version >> unconditionally. >> >> One more thing you could try is the following. The PCIe link will >> have L1 support enabled, but the NIC won't actively trigger it. >> This should be sufficient for the system to reach higher PC package >> power saving states. > > After applying this patch, the issue can't be got. > I also tried to call rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(tp, false); on > rtl8169h/8111h on intel platform. > the machine could go deeper to pc10. You mean with the current rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(tp, true) you reach only a lower pc state with RTL8168h? Unfortunately Realtek doesn't release datasheets, therefore I don't know the exact function of the affected registers/bits. > After tried this patch, I still think there's a hw issue on ASPM for rtl8106e. > How do you think which next step is better? > > Im very appreciate your effort. > Thanks > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c >> index b923958af..be162d2f5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c >> @@ -3510,7 +3510,6 @@ static void rtl_hw_start_8106(struct rtl8169_private *tp) >> rtl_eri_write(tp, 0x1b0, ERIAR_MASK_0011, 0x0000); >> >> rtl_pcie_state_l2l3_disable(tp); >> - rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(tp, true); >> } >> >> DECLARE_RTL_COND(rtl_mac_ocp_e00e_cond) >> -- >> 2.32.0 >> >> >> >> >>>> - If you want to return a bool, declare the return value as bool. >>>> - You shouldn't have to disable the LinkChg interrupt. The interrupt just triggers >>>> a phylib state machine run what may result in a faster link-up signal even >>>> when using polling. >>> >>> ok. >>> >>>> >>>> By the way: All Realtek vendor drivers (r8101, r8168, r8125) don't use the LinkChg >>>> interrupt. However I don't think this is because of known hw issues, more likely >>>> it's because they don't use phylib and thought polling is the easier approach. >>>> At least for r8169 I haven't heard yet of any complain regarding the LinkChg >>>> interrupt. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c >>>>>> index 50f0f621b..60014b9c4 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_phy_config.c >>>>>> @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static void rtl8106e_hw_phy_config(struct rtl8169_private *tp, >>>>>> r8169_apply_firmware(tp); >>>>>> >>>>>> rtl_writephy_batch(phydev, phy_reg_init); >>>>>> + phy_write(phydev, 0x18, 0x8310); >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> static void rtl8125_legacy_force_mode(struct phy_device *phydev) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.32.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>