Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp480571pxj; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:39:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyf3z59WOvgENG2A3KF5pdqr6WzwGW4/E/1sv9Fgcw5lUYK4i4V3HgjcVHJXGiMkOvXHYUs X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6156:: with SMTP id p22mr4352779ejl.242.1623328745484; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:39:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623328745; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EAeDo97U5+bVo6JeEqmMyTVQ2+syR29O1x5aTQL4y+35nxUTHVk53C/W+o75ic2FFt kwSydkgEb4u7k+rn2vyoO0IBG3QweSoZP/e2faNYZ6KvGp0ILuwra+KMu+t9SvzQq8FL GwvIR4e0m6AegPhyDv9Zt837H7/c5kf83n+yY3MUBKbNpb5Ua/DwbsumE7RSn3e5vTOo PznoQrblKojBhiqEREqvWuRAlqoyCdR3TBbE9TPzLVrObLqs3dpe6WjYhIogDYubJExz 6HScbRBSplGh5h5oAwn9Ah1sUdhBDDOc7JzoyDQ3CvOuxwwkfLU5LIL3Z3fmC5b3PY/R qhhA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=DryC4gm1V1ps3hYYfdbOMOleEbuEB698VyIVzY1uxf8=; b=R0gU3Iuw0pONOCel3KuBDhRexpSk9IceMr5jU+hXWYH2A+kOOL70xKgopQg1UaQ67r h1ilqtJ42WDG01em3oxzVLybV/NzT41G3pcqp2Ze0bVMSIVR8MNOi09WUwOKvlf+tt0b dA2BFeT/Vyjud4YCBR71XOOPebNMNYiNFyuwo8aQ6+4eYw47ETQajFuJ8DHL/5XeYa4S tLCdyzzmB0Cx5+z76vJ47PN3nPt4FSuWrsBwQ54M6KSjVnga3Oswxkq77x5Ms7m+8BwS cJI8GKRhMMae4NPc2NQxlV1bZTJ4NEydHz0lcy2BxFNZeJcwzk7U7iEQPuF8k5RSPMHs YuVw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hq27si2195575ejc.34.2021.06.10.05.38.40; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230281AbhFJMjd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:39:33 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58338 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230267AbhFJMjc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:39:32 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5148B613DF; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrJwD-006jLK-Um; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:37:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:37:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87im2lrj3m.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: John Garry Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [report] use-after-free in __irq_resolve_mapping() In-Reply-To: <6715098c-6845-c4a1-31ca-42101350c80a@huawei.com> References: <6715098c-6845-c4a1-31ca-42101350c80a@huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: john.garry@huawei.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 12:59:26 +0100, John Garry wrote: > > JFYI, on -next 20210608, I find this on my arm64 D06 and D05: [...] Funny what happens when you blindly replace radix_tree_delete() with radix_tree_insert(NULL) and fail to realise that no, they aren't equivalent... I'll pick a brown paper bag from the stack. I'll run some more tests on some of the bigger iron before rebuilding irq/irqchip-next, but it certainly looks less broken now. Thanks again, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.