Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp491213pxj; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:55:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwho6VZ/usTr0rk1ey0tdERot48b2FQGBhLvUaBFAi9jkUWNSZPdiWfqEW1fXIHdaV305o X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2892:: with SMTP id o18mr4204436ejd.124.1623329753840; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:55:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623329753; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gFY6i4jBVeZ+74EZvpR2CBpsyDJenj32YInmqGIgVIz2EfrMk4wy55NMKxFnL/dbDB K43Xe7LIMGAV/94HwePaLcUjZQirF1wwUo5gwZKHpQxYLYObQXZPe+dDwnZ4aeXp2TAI 45fRpk14J9AjMxSOW4+/w5NZwiYtxdmFjJnD3D51CVtShcKXpt5dU7tUY64eGVixrSLf V8OHsktNiUo4wT4xwyG3wNbklKoQGu+Y/2cf46UKFbRKIO2/At7PUqGBGbuhgCWVuHDR clPnvR/9xxuN7B12zn+H+B9MFzDT5QYwQ32BxN0xb8MKc66hcmI3NkmBG8VRnDmRK5/Q 8+jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=cDZfxcYxVBAM2kcA09vCMHOPg0oXwznoTb7ZScVYvmw=; b=vjGWX0Iz8iPvf5e5q5kZJoYaNulk8dSvm+AFXZ/uaIYKXv8I0FL2R7PeU0DLkhJFrf FPMw2WS+Vfo4wfO3ti3qrlJd0a9ajkyjs15G6wCbNNS0qYcVLh4SyB3uVdj2GWpf5QBy Ck2ACW83PAgCKLbR22dkrK/4eicwj78KbXVbnpj3zDBB46QhFqz+U5jQX5hF0raHgZfM wmq2EqjowvefCfWKtzlGLxfW7GKhtHXuTZz5t3s8+CpsamsiqOtA24PCvgKGu5UaISCu x0rb8BsCGTHKp5h0CD/tBb7evrO/YBU+fwc7c2AxKuNPaXxbZUz5SAHirOVZf/0ysa3x 6BUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id zh8si2701954ejb.109.2021.06.10.05.55.30; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230299AbhFJMzx (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:55:53 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59248 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230035AbhFJMzw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:55:52 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6309C106F; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.6] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF4FA3F73D; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 05:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cgroup SCHED_IDLE support To: Josh Don , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot Cc: Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Paul Turner , David Rientjes , Oleg Rombakh , Viresh Kumar , Steve Sistare , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210608231132.32012-1-joshdon@google.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:53:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210608231132.32012-1-joshdon@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Josh, On 09/06/2021 01:11, Josh Don wrote: [...] > static void __maybe_unused cpu_period_quota_print(struct seq_file *sf, > @@ -10306,6 +10318,12 @@ static struct cftype cpu_files[] = { > .read_s64 = cpu_weight_nice_read_s64, > .write_s64 = cpu_weight_nice_write_s64, > }, > + { > + .name = "idle", > + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT, > + .read_s64 = cpu_idle_read_s64, > + .write_s64 = cpu_idle_write_s64, > + }, Any reason why this should only work on cgroup-v2? struct cftype cpu_legacy_files[] vs. cpu_files[] [...] > @@ -11340,10 +11408,14 @@ void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(shares_mutex); > > -int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares) > +#define IDLE_WEIGHT sched_prio_to_weight[ARRAY_SIZE(sched_prio_to_weight) - 1] Why not 3 ? Like for tasks (WEIGHT_IDLEPRIO)? [...]