Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp547570pxj; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXP795mHv4oxEXwL+3yAumRhorIrOgZrDOBKEIvZ+/xRmnjjuORJnj+GKhOp2mBYLAQb33 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9801:: with SMTP id ji1mr4755779ejc.523.1623334128430; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623334128; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O5CYDyXhVVyKb2nHQ4ID0qfMUtXqlN5kKTW0+wU/A+wffcn4msWBLOUvE3/WVxqYxY j/Dq4i7tUVxnbq9oHG11UFxO21O0kZ9I/ldab61e+sOlnLCl1iFMF8qmaGj6/SXc8tC+ y+j+JXr6RWVDWnHlAiK/9naxT2jNnOdecUmSMijqV5ifAI9zke5UIHFEeVFJmzEMSw42 amuz1fX0ArJLZCpA5S4D70E3QIAoK5/8+l6P4StdjQAxMv0llHCTchxozEX5Y2++3q2L MPA1L5BDVD1t7T7a0ioVfyqiDchaSzqneQoBBBtjJZp2wuda5sM0qR8UFGeVaj3Wb+pJ K6Uw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=Z6ub7pvDqFtDiTwXtMx8jLhZJM2a5qX5b72fu3qKsR8=; b=dSoNkFAvHmD04iq7BvbVTBL+EgnOxeMLUNvBvV9aOEoSSCU+DdQOZooVnxQBNIqA4Q sDO+alS7Fhqy2B0pfN/3Xm3+MRve5Jh0HIzf4Eu33AU3bKeG7txhZvuJQd53XUTKQK+6 a1lgstd/KEr8WdxnZpS/zc0cEY3A3ZmGpszc9QInRSnORoS7HYIZdHwiHVWIAwVwmAXi wl5C3Mw2u0koA2IU29FhllciZzhCYrkIDD9l9FP/Hhk6rsX4bPvaJ6zpWFO5xb9oucON ugQ7dB+LfxKdce5kBbovPbe/XN/ZtA5Q87+Rv74im9+n6PVlxKION6mzp5T8rcYsL3/o bW+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z5si2313085ejx.415.2021.06.10.07.08.23; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231310AbhFJOIv (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:08:51 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:63715 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230311AbhFJOIu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:08:50 -0400 Received: from fsav401.sakura.ne.jp (fsav401.sakura.ne.jp [133.242.250.100]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15AE6rlQ041099; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:06:53 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav401.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav401.sakura.ne.jp); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:06:53 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav401.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (M106072142033.v4.enabler.ne.jp [106.72.142.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 15AE6qAS041083 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:06:53 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/oom_kill: allow oom kill allocating task for non-global case To: Aaron Tomlin , Michal Hocko Cc: Waiman Long , Shakeel Butt , Linux MM , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , LKML References: <6d23ce58-4c4b-116a-6d74-c2cf4947492b@redhat.com> <353d012f-e8d4-c54c-b33e-54737e1a0115@redhat.com> <20210609143534.v65qknfihqimiivd@ava.usersys.com> <20210610122323.6geriip66jjmdstj@ava.usersys.com> <20210610133644.zpoqfvlchaey24za@ava.usersys.com> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:06:47 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210610133644.zpoqfvlchaey24za@ava.usersys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/06/10 22:36, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > On Thu 2021-06-10 14:43 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Well, I am not sure this is a good thing in general. We do not want to >> hide tasks. We already do display oom_score_adj_min even though they are >> not eligible and that can serve a good purpose from my experience. It >> gives us some picture at least. Maybe a flag to mark all uneligible >> tasks would be something useful but I wouldn't drop them from the list. > > Fair enough. Yes, marking ineligible (i.e. oom_badness() returning LONG_MIN) tasks would be useful. By the way, was the task namely "node" (i.e. PID 1703345) multithreaded program? Your kernel might want commit 7775face207922ea ("memcg: killed threads should not invoke memcg OOM killer").