Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp38012pxj; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:06:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyK628Jc/4b2bdN2X3+p9K2gV/ZqIsB6ufMxYkn25zlI9c4sjoSLr3WM2IPl1x0Ucy50t1L X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee84:: with SMTP id f4mr377940edr.97.1623359216631; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:06:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623359216; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ezeX/WsEXCiOSHz8Ahusu13wszfTgCDEs7a5Fc4sNHeXG6sULtSRE3lmCM45sVRUyj In9kHw3SH40vGuVQqShf+5yS5qk9A2KHaLMfO6zYfT92yQwmLEIBPUeSXUKPKBmzFEln hAERkfLXLlRBOlUE62LA1/yDSYRxx4d7eayQ3bAIySuLrfQzwk8BPf+hSbMTRjs+AqK3 kkB88WQJXMCGpdrqg8UYmED7IE+osNp8VHbI8OJtgdwruReQwUTDt18mTx+UroLvEFrW tKGoqhGdqjf3Fn/D4dz5PooDVzj49jLDgCovrQCgypPUuvtHrFloyXHgqWewKDUo6wky kNUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-filter; bh=9heYwDg7HkXqmnRyjiu31yAcnxTkKMw3sVGVK8qX7II=; b=B9ZHdA6BzD2+jWiJ8Y0tnYIimCLaFyPqUxgoOIh4nOxj/0fiTgetGbRwfT4Re9EPGY swmBqGQgfcSuYFTSuC+f62p4TVwIVQv/qJ8cPTLf5JStH62zjVjgFWV5UCf+izrIwX5m ANXlImNIuNgJr4nQX23s//GwGWjg6+wHO8uqusDfV3fOakZC42YWWON+StZclxoFGI0l E9w4g0oJiiq4u/f2w5F3mRBxq+OjFaiikDvplLuo39w8iAGbezEgYHB1pahVEONRqkiu f0jjcIDWlkrLdWzuN8/WAoECyfzEvjU4JSlN9UTtbs2+7tZf1pzroc93tZ09usRl8xvx 7C0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b="NL/mZr/s"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cq27si2830014edb.222.2021.06.10.14.06.32; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b="NL/mZr/s"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230346AbhFJVHB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:07:01 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:59734 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229963AbhFJVHB (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:07:01 -0400 Received: from sequoia (162-237-133-238.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [162.237.133.238]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A69520B7178; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:05:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 1A69520B7178 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1623359104; bh=9heYwDg7HkXqmnRyjiu31yAcnxTkKMw3sVGVK8qX7II=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NL/mZr/sTjypmf8YXwF9PG/hiD3wixy3Z8rZov3Q4mL477kgo3L+JGWgn5s1E/IhJ ok1Q2mM+7sKmkUGr4th02hNY+gb2HRC533UHj4s/mXCKrzfqjZeeNL1WvBMeab1g3z TJczE2jmC3xVo/G1up5fiW4ZFLlX5bKSWA+85HKs= Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:05:01 -0500 From: Tyler Hicks To: Jens Wiklander Cc: Sumit Garg , Rijo-john.Thomas@amd.com, Allen Pais , Peter Huewe , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe , Vikas Gupta , Thirupathaiah Annapureddy , Pavel Tatashin , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-integrity , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] tee: Support shm registration without dma-buf backing Message-ID: <20210610210501.GP4910@sequoia> References: <20210609002326.210024-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> <20210609002326.210024-6-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> <20210609054621.GB4910@sequoia> <20210609121533.GA2267052@jade> <20210609134225.GC4910@sequoia> <20210610074948.GC2753553@jade> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210610074948.GC2753553@jade> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-06-10 09:49:48, Jens Wiklander wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:42:25AM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > [snip] > > > I've just posted "[PATCH 0/7] tee: shared memory updates", > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210609102324.2222332-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org/ > > > > > > Where tee_shm_alloc() is replaced by among other functions > > > tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(). tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf() takes care of the > > > problem with TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF. > > > > Thanks! At first glance, that series would take care of the last three > > patches in my kexec/kdump series. > > > > I'm a bit worried that it is a rewrite of the shm allocator. Do you plan > > to send all of that to stable? (I mentioned earlier in this thread that > > I'm affected by these bugs in linux-5.4.y.) > > No, that might be a bit much. > > > Also, you and Sumit don't seem to have the same opinion on kernel > > drivers making use of tee_shm_register() for allocations that are only > > used internally. Can you comment on that? > > > > I'm not clear on the next steps for fixing these kexec/kdump bugs in > > older releases. I appreciate any guidance here. > > Neither am I be honest. You're the only one that has brought up this > problem so perhaps it's enough to focus on the stable branch you need to > have fixed. I've already added Fixes tags to all of my patches. If you are comfortable with them going to stable, you'd add 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' to them if/when you merge them so that the stable team will ensure that they're applied. Note that I'm not the only person that brought up this bug: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/3637 Once I started digging in, I realized that there were more kexec/kdump bugs and the series grew. > If I've understood it correctly it's best if it's possible to > cherry-pick the fixes from mainline to the stable branch in question. > So we must make sure to get your needed patches in before any rewrites > that would make cherry-picking impossible. The rewrite I'm proposing > isn't urgent so it can be held off for a while. Thanks for holding off. I'll be quick on my revisions so that you don't have to moth ball your series for too much longer. Tyler > > Cheers, > Jens >