Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp336828pxj; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:57:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6HNd3IezukPJXaXrEgY/DRJ+wayU9nijnrAUz5zGdeeLv2HVs2mjhkT8Z3xdZ9o+SS5Cj X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:26ce:: with SMTP id x14mr2219128edd.104.1623394647194; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:57:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623394647; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OsG41Q072h7PTE6Zw1zu+Vkka7N+kgJ0hIWCupacZs1WWr0ypIssUuFR54RLAED9uQ uLFsmIfz5SoGSuZrrY4hf5c7NpDhhrEG0OZSDzjDWCNikO0i5bz+AwI9YpzL8QlFy0Ko SfMZ/v3geSW5uJOw5wTU/On+xpKhHWvCgxo5yOeCyRC3JP6EFdfj4QawDMBlIAVB8/V2 sRyl0R5btBS35rjPEB2vH2g4fykG7d8bA8P/QAa6yLw8P7D1gBCHrIb5nDiUxygQGFE8 wP/eOqM9QVcu4qw5neNAjsdoToArxtdQsGVBHo4B0hqbOu+L5dL6FTmcdObpxnj4xlVp dmqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=N2XJlMbDzn+ePfxRClY3gO0FkSnDmd58pgVQ6MHl3tc=; b=Q1sVQC31TM+FYAWUOi9Afsm63Lk3a16K0XNoDiZejvMnJRxoDnVvOzz8hxGJ9LAUgs aooOGMLDkJGqiNGBi35FLWkW3TElvyGfjvLhRIQCQNqA8Z2NRwEKt7SMvAyrZw/DYgzr Zo4Mo702OrlV5Ux4VN/Tm7pGngA75V+W7nxwxSajYoBLZFppaI1CnRvQQGjFbNeX107N 8sO7c3o987dRX2unKvSY6rbpxSgfDofwdsA5iL/dstziTO17RpaqqpaW1T2akYojtdi0 SmuPNiR6G0YOuomG76JG9qc4edAqLP5qCybmmKLcGiCo2Aq/ekJuIkbWPIWVPKRCLncD N7dg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=PCAPx+Bw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si3972194ejr.444.2021.06.10.23.57.04; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=PCAPx+Bw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231175AbhFKG5q (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 02:57:46 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:34258 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230248AbhFKG5p (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 02:57:45 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1631FD3F; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:55:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1623394547; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=N2XJlMbDzn+ePfxRClY3gO0FkSnDmd58pgVQ6MHl3tc=; b=PCAPx+BwqsoG/XE8TBDIzCqULGdJAN2G7SFwSw8L9QIyY4yJlSK+MQ7MjNVvOm3X5Fisy8 GEPQ6bBMT1RAY99VdFqGe5HvS2k9xcZ+5UzLuAspyJ9l6JTntkWJaoDcdCoLpugh4qQ5qk mw6LSSH4Htk4HULGkTvBSvGIg8yj6hw= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4953AA3B87; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:55:45 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Aaron Tomlin , Waiman Long , Shakeel Butt , Linux MM , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/oom_kill: allow oom kill allocating task for non-global case Message-ID: References: <353d012f-e8d4-c54c-b33e-54737e1a0115@redhat.com> <20210609143534.v65qknfihqimiivd@ava.usersys.com> <20210610122323.6geriip66jjmdstj@ava.usersys.com> <20210610133644.zpoqfvlchaey24za@ava.usersys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 10-06-21 23:06:47, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/06/10 22:36, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > > On Thu 2021-06-10 14:43 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> Well, I am not sure this is a good thing in general. We do not want to > >> hide tasks. We already do display oom_score_adj_min even though they are > >> not eligible and that can serve a good purpose from my experience. It > >> gives us some picture at least. Maybe a flag to mark all uneligible > >> tasks would be something useful but I wouldn't drop them from the list. > > > > Fair enough. > > Yes, marking ineligible (i.e. oom_badness() returning LONG_MIN) tasks would be useful. > > By the way, was the task namely "node" (i.e. PID 1703345) multithreaded program? > Your kernel might want commit 7775face207922ea ("memcg: killed threads should not invoke memcg OOM killer"). Yes, this would help for multithreaded race situation indeed. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs