Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp469217pxj; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:52:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvrfiqNSsEYFGG+1a3IFQD9R68xjoEXDVvu2x/Pdq3KSP/qhVGXS8M+rGOtYKij7u3qYeK X-Received: by 2002:a50:a413:: with SMTP id u19mr2944486edb.251.1623408739984; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:52:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623408739; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k9F/bFmmApORyBJuHQdNSamCQ0oZukB2hyuaLtzVTYSQLKAKG9evr7oJ5jCyUZtKJr Ggekv0bhb/Wu/cUmAyFN5YbgUZgmjoisVka6LA0uHeVXN8VA6QdESo8rfZR/YmjpLACw X8aJBg4nRdYOEKPyLQmpcVORz/8O3ni6gSY1s4AHERMXWWClDM+uyiS8qh/HeTsOTHrv rYxXkkQEMWmh7PsucGkUqJD0XEfSZl8Ashiu50FLU1R94gt+92F+kuG3iNj29wQV9fEh mjx6vNlXjFx5t/9yE94AYmZ3ASb5bHd99OBUZgOaUZzzF/+YsBHBoON60CwQx5AW1KqK gCsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=lZslTxIM2FrNFERC2sMKX7bKD6A1XdOQl/wW6tiTA2M=; b=lSIALiF+cLFkQQWB/XcwPUbFwkMmtDfukRZX30BEXSlpAOZz+ihD+qeQqpc6pRIS8N f9FeVYmXv/uFd6TWic2qvXvrMU1SE2UYOo3GAKKK99u7U3xDGF1In55G7nmmS+e7O8R0 056nGx+n4QEve/4f9YMSpJHHolUHI97gYad0SONen2RgtChogRfYKbvr62QusdGw5Q5v d9G2/w0Y1XrXY/ieOUCw7unTv/+wV6WFHVSaYBov1A5aR4ift2DaYuKJsMV1f+aIhGEl knz6k9aMGQlSUBNTFMjdD/CAP/+fekbGoyuUYXjGal9KWawZ1Qe2hPtYWhKzdWCpW1P7 kuzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q5si4672410eds.277.2021.06.11.03.51.56; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230365AbhFKKud (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:50:33 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:40004 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229633AbhFKKud (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:50:33 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id 9E4151F44523 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Shuah Khan , ~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht, nfraprado@collabora.com, leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com, Vitor Massaru Iha , lucmaga@gmail.com, David Gow , Daniel Latypov , tales.aparecida@gmail.com References: <20210610163959.71634-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= Message-ID: <7ad34395-2b62-58fb-8a63-7b4899460290@collabora.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 07:48:26 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, Às 06:55 de 11/06/21, Andy Shevchenko escreveu: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 01:39:58PM -0300, André Almeida wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch converts existing UUID runtime test to use KUnit framework. >> >> Below, there's a comparison between the old output format and the new >> one. Keep in mind that even if KUnit seems very verbose, this is the >> corner case where _every_ test has failed. > > Btw, do we have test coverage statistics? > > I mean since we reduced 18 test cases to 12, do we still have the same / better > test coverage? > I don't think we have automated statistics, but I can assure you that the coverage it's exactly the same. We are testing two correlated functions with the same input, in a single test case, instead of having a single case for each one, so that's why the number of cases is reduced. For example, instead of: total_tests++; if (guid_parse(data->uuid, &le)) total_tests++; if (!guid_equal(&data->le, &le)) We now have: KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(guid_parse(data->guid, &le), 0) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(guid_equal(&data->le, &le)) That will count as a single test.