Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        syzbot+fb0b6a7e8713aeb0319c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Emulate triple fault shutdown if RSM
 emulation fails
In-Reply-To: <YMIwF/so0I+w60kt@google.com>
References: <20210609185619.992058-1-seanjc@google.com>
 <20210609185619.992058-3-seanjc@google.com>
 <87eedayvkn.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <YMIwF/so0I+w60kt@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:42:27 +0200
Message-ID: <874ke4y6e4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> why don't we have triple fault printed in trace by default BTW???
>
> Or maybe trace_kvm_make_request()?

... or maybe just trace_kvm_check_request()? 

$ git grep  'kvm_make_request(' arch/x86/kvm/ | wc -l
115
$ git grep  'kvm_check_request(' arch/x86/kvm/ | wc -l
41

-- 
Vitaly