Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
To:     linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com,
        penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, llong@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm/oom_kill: show oom eligibility when displaying the current memory state of all tasks
Date:   Fri, 11 Jun 2021 18:19:40 +0100
Message-Id: <20210611171940.960887-1-atomlin@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

At the present time, when showing potential OOM victims, we do not
exclude tasks which already have MMF_OOM_SKIP set; it is possible that
the last OOM killable victim was already OOM killed, yet the OOM
reaper failed to reclaim memory and set MMF_OOM_SKIP.
This can be confusing/or perhaps even misleading, to the reader of the
OOM report. Now, we already unconditionally display a task's
oom_score_adj_min value that can be set to OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN which is
indicative of an "unkillable" task i.e. is not eligible.

This patch provides a clear indication with regard to the OOM
eligibility of each displayed task.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index eefd3f5fde46..70781d681a6e 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -160,6 +160,27 @@ static inline bool is_sysrq_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
 	return oc->order == -1;
 }
 
+/**
+ * is_task_eligible_oom - determine if and why a task cannot be OOM killed
+ * @tsk: task to check
+ *
+ * Needs to be called with task_lock().
+ */
+static const char * is_task_oom_eligible(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	long adj;
+
+	adj = (long)p->signal->oom_score_adj;
+	if (adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
+		return "no: oom score";
+	else if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &p->mm->flags)
+		return "no: oom reaped";
+	else if (in_vfork(p))
+		return "no: in vfork";
+	else
+		return "yes";
+}
+
 /* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */
 static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p)
 {
@@ -401,12 +422,13 @@ static int dump_task(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	pr_info("[%7d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %8ld %8lu         %5hd %s\n",
+	pr_info("[%7d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %8ld %8lu         %5hd %-15s %s\n",
 		task->pid, from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(task)),
 		task->tgid, task->mm->total_vm, get_mm_rss(task->mm),
 		mm_pgtables_bytes(task->mm),
 		get_mm_counter(task->mm, MM_SWAPENTS),
-		task->signal->oom_score_adj, task->comm);
+		task->signal->oom_score_adj, is_task_oom_eligible(task),
+		task->comm);
 	task_unlock(task);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -420,12 +442,13 @@ static int dump_task(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
  * memcg, not in the same cpuset, or bound to a disjoint set of mempolicy nodes
  * are not shown.
  * State information includes task's pid, uid, tgid, vm size, rss,
- * pgtables_bytes, swapents, oom_score_adj value, and name.
+ * pgtables_bytes, swapents, oom_score_adj value, oom eligible status
+ * and name.
  */
 static void dump_tasks(struct oom_control *oc)
 {
 	pr_info("Tasks state (memory values in pages):\n");
-	pr_info("[  pid  ]   uid  tgid total_vm      rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name\n");
+	pr_info("[  pid  ]   uid  tgid total_vm      rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj oom eligible? name\n");
 
 	if (is_memcg_oom(oc))
 		mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->memcg, dump_task, oc);
-- 
2.26.3