Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2109380pxj; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1VrRCD7ecC5Cv4vHYhkbhf/ULF0znw/n3UeuJ9KNj6BUOrnxicVHmffH5H6iM0OlWWXFK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:394e:: with SMTP id g14mr11764326eje.3.1623599620942; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:53:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623599620; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V3E8d8x/0Q9qVQFumKJkELUcJ/nvlIrVkSmBkiTX9BhX8xIxQ5LTzT5Lbhuk6wxo1b vuAPIAsyI3eg22erwhxBKIj6qW8hF/KT4r/ome72H4w8BkiphGsKsaPeLPDf7GgnzcnO /CkUM9mBzyQfl6dl6J9LUZaYkfoGt/8ycNw5ygcw5NNM674lzv+oqe4pp+Rk5Zdsx5s9 F9bFqe2yUykhsNiGd5hUrOPjVzlcWMeGbr/vj1EkYUj+fIBBop6RixCBRHPjU7fe2LZZ w2tKIUGoy3fP+Z7WxxJcXalecY2t0M7HdmFon7MIXR3I56Fm7tDKrwcWWjx+NrLI/6GQ p2Vg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=5bw2eNmlwZN/Oc0ufiIBC/ou3an2y9S9y4V3FhsAa4c=; b=a8HL2cxeQNZw5NLePwENbGvutoUWpBtHvgXBRN/7v0tibfp79qfvD9tID1eutBMX+F tCWn3qPovIRWJYkDalaBoD/Ivp0ODEFTcmAa/XS3HsmCljXwAkWQ4olYIRke2LjQMKif aoE8svZ0V/thcwHWNggRziTa1+CS7ECJ8ZL53DlZb9Z3e/IjDXSFEKnrdQKgIdc2vm0N PohOJWQDsyyiFuG0ed/5Dlxn0C5hgvELvkT7nGAzBv5MtOFtDSflsopqa/pgt36h3Yh9 abAykcLJh0RmsMwri7gnOBDi/iX0fuAQITMpyWNDbo+tYDXpKxVx6P8r1nS3HKCEfex3 uH6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w4si9338909edq.419.2021.06.13.08.53.09; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231922AbhFMPxf (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 11:53:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231844AbhFMPxe (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 11:53:34 -0400 Received: from mxout017.mail.hostpoint.ch (mxout017.mail.hostpoint.ch [IPv6:2a00:d70:0:e::317]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC71C061574; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.2.46] (helo=asmtp013.mail.hostpoint.ch) by mxout017.mail.hostpoint.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lsSOZ-000Jm9-IU; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:51:31 +0200 Received: from [2a02:168:6182:1:d747:8127:5b7a:4266] by asmtp013.mail.hostpoint.ch with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lsSOZ-000DQg-Ft; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:51:31 +0200 X-Authenticated-Sender-Id: reto-schneider@reto-schneider.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: mt7621: Assign base field in gpio_chip To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , Stefan Roese , Reto Schneider , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , Matthias Brugger , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20210613120608.1527394-1-code@reto-schneider.ch> From: Reto Schneider Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:51:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, On 13.06.21 14:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It smells like a fixing non-existing bug. Yes, I understand that there > is some custom hardware with custom firmware which is using Linux kernel > with some never upstreamed patches. On top of this sysfs interface is > deprecated for already a few years and shouldn’t be considered as 1st > class citizen. > > That’s said, if there is no Fixes tag provided with clear point that _at > some point_ it was like this in upstream, I would tend to NAK this patch. I did some digging and indeed, it turned out that I used the pre-mainline GPIO driver from OpenWRT even on Kernel 4.19 (for which the current driver already got mainlined). Surely do agree on not breaking the interface in mainline, and the NAK. Sorry for wasting your time! Kind regards, Reto