Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2577076pxj; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:00:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPsxyc5/abf8/GNBxA4p+tcQjWaLz+YO8tHfnXtEfyp8+AzPhtSnH4O4eb6Zf8bo7jKZsZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:510c:: with SMTP id m12mr14210542edd.126.1623661250072; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:00:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623661250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tV0zzMmRfGXCMuAcdzzql/1X3FHZUW7FHF0kJP9r8mpJdfYJ3OXoIPWFcjUKYzC2E0 OrZPv4yqseaf6g3cOXypAjrdkGp712mzffJUauZv+Ed0CYdRJEbADsSUMmsSrvHNugy4 tZagU0/MbliJYw5pSx7eE8DFhsNicMh7CNDclBPe+WhQKkOkhV6KsqoEPv8BmFlFOWwZ jFC+cGJKa8tMQhqj6O1KwLaCh+NZ4YkD7Xo55NAn45Odw2eKlqUP+63+S4kL4voFvh3b cZuEj58l1j5gH5noEh3Qng3e7v76fW83MZsq5FjnXHsTcyzcnMBNV9Q9dZZekLzHbG5v 6k2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=cR/6zRsaGY9YfIlwevZHCWwT2etKuhsmQ987OMG5H9c=; b=cGOUpk42RjMnvAorBHFezN0/U3iaBJomv0YdNgFa+9cDuRI/eOA8fcckhNd7UTzlWs 9O8GOs1hDFpI3UeYeZrhVOlFU981OoJ71kyRLmo9MIM4KNDtqVUc+K45uKmOXzDRLObx LhnXU/Zpq+sTajBtzwdUQquQPHPH1jrFkMv+xXoNiHZII1hwylnL0UEa+CGmAcXLMZlL xq+dsqwVDMM+Y1v+FmKCB4H35HvLHONzNYgyd0dqbLYvNOIQbNAsxyU5op8RUFASnedy BlqypFtGb9d87o4DS9vLcO5/9lR9lnjfmI3gkNIMoUw9D+QSifpSMesv99sZuL4C9+0S c/ng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WQfk6x3x; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id la12si11108796ejc.560.2021.06.14.02.00.25; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 02:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WQfk6x3x; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232630AbhFNJAZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 05:00:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39520 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232528AbhFNJAY (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 05:00:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBA9C061574 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id b205so6957230wmb.3 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cR/6zRsaGY9YfIlwevZHCWwT2etKuhsmQ987OMG5H9c=; b=WQfk6x3x+g5q7nXr5DIsXFQI0uy7zxg11+IIyHQC+UuhY+9wnT76mv8Q7WQaHBlTk+ 5xGigLo4FutudtluCrEyzPPE1Za2bqGDdc6EIyUofpdrUBF47JSaD8Ay3NLAkMEUL9rz MFv3ARbz2iyPUln8kZBs6mAr8A37sCq15tLXEUNodCiQIyrivCoyBT9wBODaRJW8L8tZ j16tQzsBdt61sitpiCglhSdQL6nOXiAkxEXG+1IiqlRLkOErS4bmxZm/dbeFjvFQMdjd j1ji/02/y+ebNo23kQUqm8G8W0NeHTpoa4ef7PKIr792b74RyTKC63ZtliU1CZMrak4A SKlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cR/6zRsaGY9YfIlwevZHCWwT2etKuhsmQ987OMG5H9c=; b=Ke4b0PeKKvho/1CZ9+yJtbjelFZg2G8aKZvoYIlt0kIfjeCK4uYQ90pSUFqtfLjym0 YXxmFpJPHyneGBMAzt9vsH5gaas4uruzo6jyhrPE5vUb631fk3SrjDNZng7bF98oap4f 5GNpEwz2ZgjH5JS9jxO+iYxuxIypEgbNYLcFuWYVjoNPe9+aUpR4juD3nZWizLU81AA0 SnIUi98IXMqgvLh6p94jP9/mwSqcrtsPhRE9fUONG7XeqBGuv+/ps9dNu2RXv6XkUFXG 4Iz9/Qi5U0B1PAtfKGTLazdh1vMd6oKRldgpE/QWfsDRxrSCAn5fQrt8dq0TJ5UReO3r xzVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PbDBwbXOIwP6oCglXOT6UEH95IBjMfK/HE/SPjH7/ibc9cqwi nwZGdU3/MLa2ErSI0RGdEEQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a3c3:: with SMTP id m186mr15757009wme.154.1623661100653; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziggy.stardust ([213.195.126.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 62sm16611410wrm.1.2021.06.14.01.58.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: configs: remove redundant CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP To: Petr Vorel Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , Catalin Marinas , Luo Longjun , will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sangyan@huawei.com, ningyu9@huawei.com, luchunhua@huawei.com References: <20210507182410.10515-1-luolongjun@huawei.com> <20210511172020.GB21033@arm.com> <6ef5c7a0-3596-a67c-c99d-c8e0def8a96a@collabora.com> From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:58:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Petr, On 11/06/2021 23:39, Petr Vorel wrote: > Hi, > >> Hi all, > >> On 11/05/2021 22:04, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: >>> Hi Catalin, > >>> Thanks for cc'ing me. > >>> On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote: >>>>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output: > >>>>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig' >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to >>>>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP > >>>>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options. > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 - >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y >>>>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m >>>>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y >>>>> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m >>>>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m >>>>> CONFIG_SPMI=y >>>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y >>>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y > >>>> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it >>>> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m >>>> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant. > >>>> You could add: > >>>> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb") > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > I was going to send fix myself, I'd prefer also y, but weren't 100% sure sure. > This has landed in the arm-soc tree this weekend. Anyway, thanks for looking into this as well. Regards, Matthias > For a record: > > * CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m committed by author in 2021-01-04, merged 2021-01-31 15:31:01 > 9fd5449e061e ("arm64: configs: Support pwrap on Mediatek MT6779 platform") > sent: 4 Jan 2021 > https://lore.kernel.org/r/1609747703-27207-3-git-send-email-argus.lin@mediatek.com > Applied to v5.11-next/defconfig 31 Jan 2021 15:32:26 by Matthias Brugger > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/5d5a67a5-ac2d-9ef9-b20c-66cbd55ebb8f@gmail.com/ > > * CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=y was committed by author in 2021-03-31 11:06:57, merged 2021-03-31 12:12:59 > fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb") > sent: 31 Mar 2021 11:06:57 > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210331090659.4169966-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com > But originally sent: 9 Feb 2021 10:11:11 > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210209091112.2075478-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/ > > Kind regards, > Petr > >>> I sent the same patch some time ago [1]. > >>> I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case, > >>> Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra > >>> Matthias is this something that should go through your tree? > > >> Yes, this should go through my tree. I'll take care of it. > >> Regards, >> Matthias