Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:43:52 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
        james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com,
        igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com,
        alex.bennee@linaro.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
        mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com,
        Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com,
        Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce SCMI VirtIO transport
Message-ID: <YMdA+GkgJ+GONuJr@infradead.org>
References: <20210611165937.701-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210611165937.701-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 05:59:21PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm posting this V4 series starting from the work done up to V3 by
> OpenSynergy.

Who is 'OpenSynergy'?

> The main aim of this rework is to simplify where possible the SCMI VirtIO
> support added in V3 by adding upfront and then using some new mechanisms in
> the SCMI Core Transport layer.

And what is 'SCMI', and why would anyone want a new virtio transport?