Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753940AbWKHCsA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:48:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753942AbWKHCsA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:48:00 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:30392 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753940AbWKHCr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:47:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices From: Matt Helsley To: Paul Jackson Cc: Paul Menage , vatsa@in.ibm.com, dev@openvz.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com, rohitseth@google.com In-Reply-To: <20061107120246.4b6b3f0b.pj@sgi.com> References: <20061030031531.8c671815.pj@sgi.com> <20061030123652.d1574176.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830610301247k179b32f5xa5950d8fc5a3926c@mail.gmail.com> <20061031115342.GB9588@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830610310846m5d718d22p5e1b569d4ef4e63@mail.gmail.com> <20061101172540.GA8904@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830611011537i2de812fck99822d3dd1314992@mail.gmail.com> <20061106124948.GA3027@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830611061223m77c0ef1ei72bd7729d9284ec6@mail.gmail.com> <20061107104118.f02a1114.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830611071107u4226ec17h5facc7ee2ad53174@mail.gmail.com> <20061107120246.4b6b3f0b.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:47:54 -0800 Message-Id: <1162954075.12419.583.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 984 Lines: 25 On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 12:02 -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > Paul M wrote: > > I think it's better to treat resource groups as a common framework for > > resource controllers, rather than a resource controller itself. > > You could well be right here - I was just using resource groups > as another good example of a controller. I'll let others decide > if that's one or several controllers. At various stages different controllers were available with the core patches or separately. The numtasks, cpu, io, socket accept queue, and memory controllers were available for early CKRM patches. More recently (April 2006) numtasks, cpu, and memory controllers were available for Resource Groups. So I'd say "several". Cheers, -Matt Helsley - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/