Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:44:03 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove unnecessary tests and cast before
 kfree/kvfree
Message-ID: <20210614184403.5e3097ba@coco.lan>
In-Reply-To: <3355688.ByQz1z8koQ@linux.local>
References: <20210605020855.1065-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
        <3355688.ByQz1z8koQ@linux.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Em Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:33:55 +0200
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi All,
> 
> I've seen that some patches of mine, more recent the following ones, have 
> already been applied. In the past I had noticed that the patches are 
> (usually?) placed in a time of submission ordered FIFO, unless they are 
> rejected.
> 
> I'm wondering if I should re-send them or if I am missing some details about 
> the specific workflow of staging/media.

Any patches sent to linux-media@vger.kernel.org are automatically stored
at patchwork:

	https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/

If the patches you sent are there and are marked with "New" state,
there's no need to re-submit. On a quick check, there are 3 media
patches from you there:

	https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=&submitter=8492&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=
	
No need to resubmit those, except if some reviewer asks you to
change your patch(es).

Thanks,
Mauro