Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752913AbWKHKjR (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:39:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965574AbWKHKjR (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:39:17 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:19942 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752913AbWKHKjQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:39:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 02:38:36 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: Paul Jackson Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, akpm@osdl.org, mbligh@google.com, menage@google.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohitseth@google.com, holt@sgi.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset: Explicit dynamic sched domain cpuset flag Message-Id: <20061108023836.0f3bbd18.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20061031064300.10a97c13.pj@sgi.com> References: <20061030212615.GA10567@in.ibm.com> <20061030212922.GA20369@in.ibm.com> <20061031064300.10a97c13.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1469 Lines: 36 Dinakar, Where do we stand on this patch? Last I knew, as of a week ago: * I had (still have) a patch in *-mm to nuke the old connection between the cpu_exclusive flag and sched domain partitioning: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets.patch * and you have this patch posted on lkml, with some non-trivial comments from myself, to provide a new 'sched_domain' per-cpuset flag to control sched domain partitioning. Ideally, we'd agree on this new 'sched_domain' (or whatever we call it) flag, so that my patch to remove the old hooks could travel to 2.6.20 along with this present patch to provide new and improved hooks. However ... I need to focus on some other stuff for roughly four weeks, so can't focus on pushing this effort along right now. My guess is that I will end up asking Andrew to hold the above named "remove ... hooks" patch in *-mm until you and I get our act together on the replacement, which most likely will mean he holds it until we start work on what will become 2.6.21. Do you see any better choices? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/