Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor
 prep_irq_for_user_exit()
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
References: <809d316bf5f1a81acdd69e220c13e716dac24f53.1622818556.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
 <3fbef68e1cffc0ebbbad1893e4fb9426b0915039.1622818556.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
 <1623378421.ayihg84s3a.astroid@bobo.none>
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Message-ID: <4f21c7c2-d04b-dcb6-09ad-562a2c3cf88f@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:37:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1623378421.ayihg84s3a.astroid@bobo.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


Le 11/06/2021 à 04:30, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of June 5, 2021 12:56 am:
>> prep_irq_for_user_exit() is a superset of
>> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit().
>>
>> Refactor it.
> 
> I like the refactoring, but now prep_irq_for_user_exit() is calling
> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit(), which seems like the wrong naming.
> 
> You could re-name prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit() to
> prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() maybe? Or it could be
> __prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() then prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit()
> and prep_irq_for_user_exit() would both call it.

I renamed it prep_irq_for_enabled_exit().

And I realised that after patch 4, prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() has become a trivial function used 
only once.

So I swapped patches 1/2 with patches 3/4 and added a 5th one to squash prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() 
into its caller.

You didn't have any comment on patch 4 (that is now patch 2) ?

Thanks for the review
Christophe