Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:45:51 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@metux.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>,
        Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
        stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "Stefano Garzarella --cc virtualization @ lists . linux-foundation . org" 
        <sgarzare@redhat.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Alistair Strachan <astrachan@google.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] gpio: Add virtio-gpio driver
Message-ID: <20210615111551.7tcz7teqp4olhodf@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1623326176.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <10442926ae8a65f716bfc23f32339a6b35e51d5a.1623326176.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <CACRpkdZV2v2S5z7CZf_8DV=At9-oPSj7RYFH78hWy3ZX37QnDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210611035623.z4f2ynumzozigqnv@vireshk-i7>
 <CAMuHMdVrtSnFpPbB0P3Wxqm1D6vU1_cnh3ypsZJRNF6ueKdAsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210611080122.tlkidv6bowuka6fw@vireshk-i7>
 <CAMuHMdVL4VH09ixPcpqqokNJeYd68Th2Y6Lz4PZTF7h06OOBGw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVL4VH09ixPcpqqokNJeYd68Th2Y6Lz4PZTF7h06OOBGw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 11-06-21, 10:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The same reasoning can apply to your backend daemon, so when using
> the GPIO aggregator, you can just control a full gpiochip, without
> having to implement access control on individual GPIO lines.

I tried to look at it and it surely looks very temping and may fit
well and reduce size of my backend :)

I am now wondering how interrupts can be made to work here. Do you
have anything in mind for that ?

GPIO sysfs already supports interrupts, just that you need to register
irq for the specific GPIO pins inside the aggregator ?

-- 
viresh