Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4137208pxj; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:31:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQG5Hmo1CXd6TKXHpQzH3y7mPyGkAsNCgWBpL2lI1lDH4Tt62IoBlgfXv2KiY3DdDNP2US X-Received: by 2002:a92:1e08:: with SMTP id e8mr1477073ile.10.1623799862046; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:31:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623799862; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SSI6CQ8DMdbnGn5KbSFT2Zd0Xpde/gGO/odwJYdmCc/IwE9pSVy8E7O3gBfM0bAGbX 5UoJAZ+L8Q5U8B45xhpuylbVVmMKd1sLkTt8spYHDRuraJGIP2lhiH9uCizk845rVjjw SuQYOzzAGzobyLkDtv8WZ4sT19XfitI1vfqbR4D0bc3mzKWKo211fP4Uag63iisyAs2X XohQmaxKDeIJ95TyA/bEbIoOIw7OWuRdn4MLcj1uYmeb4BaOQDBM5GE26ChbGtAUnK+y Eao82JeN0+N3fH2uMJYdQvgQJhLbpwr735vHujrmMC7aj/MUkcrJB2sS3UMZsCUvh/Ig nWEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=dMu6Ebpu3T3ImGY3emMLa/ibwH7Jz5A6ZlvdLonFw94=; b=brKQIE11taXRHH6YzYJiyIltWJPwZJHUavoaF4XW3w0Y1DurRIDVPc0ahjbkqW2xrK NN5odsbUMNq4WHiEmX6V46VRaprnO3GoZyWmZt3Dl+K5HRGQlSJMBhZpCYcAs8MrGJr3 cKCHZ4CH4c8Vvu9hMthp1sPF40YszTyJmcJbeaFykoGEgy91PqHusIvuQVowD+myclDU 01rw3Jt/8HtRHhGnHr+lwygbYg36iz4V+Bd1FKLr9E59ib2FdwEWaPinmrTbBA2wrrSe vME9gvG60dnKXsrPQ1xtTDxWt3tMQOnAPYHq2corhWZGCEJ6sigCzdnviRiNy3KZuCRw JDxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JQbC59Bt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s8si557123jap.89.2021.06.15.16.30.49; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JQbC59Bt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231569AbhFOXcB (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:32:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48756 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229966AbhFOXb7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:31:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD957C061574; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id d7so219966edx.0; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dMu6Ebpu3T3ImGY3emMLa/ibwH7Jz5A6ZlvdLonFw94=; b=JQbC59Bt9iZ2ofmMkX7Kl9HL7wZA/xVTJDwwp0xpvuMwo3pba02UrjnNg9d0zCKfaD 4JHyjgm+fvkt0QAozm0OGqxqsBPAGJoSnlb0bIQz6uj7Z72RNQMiPbdy4MfmqnmL38Aj Ou986wZdevoaPTBs4B//uhLDseLwl1c6b6gZY3zloQsCd13iAANAM4/dG8lO4whN3fGu NlR4704c85iQ3g17AcdaSdqFJN1NK2k1NI1c3xmTCPPdqhOu44itOnKwBlvaScfLYepe 3rhHqQqlMbSbSL+BKlzLolRqG6uTd/1idpXMkHRjbDL9LeQPt4EZXzoz/2vB7Q+IWvf1 GSvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dMu6Ebpu3T3ImGY3emMLa/ibwH7Jz5A6ZlvdLonFw94=; b=CQ68oiAatZjpOyxArxpXtU3WGljyxGdn0VN0pSSEdE+s2mJEpc2Hju3RW0JtIaftXh oK1wcdysDTVY0emR9OJAMZjbJ08TMtcvhnT/gACBZTPz2gymyitatimTvF8FnQzpahUj UzmlbHh+WTzmdqBN8Z/P6bTT5ZrmZs5Ca8nfA5kmcfRhf1qc3RcAI17oEP67oH+ME+ls Un7HCliy6Lh34WaNNqf1TDGHuwuGcbqWnMHzXMtkjbiVQdB4gBzfLvLCL05M6qs/tPCv CAfTRUq5d9e3UWCCqFfYSwPhnqzmajlqv8S/t6rRjhA0ml7KzCEA+k/88P9/4o8pZv5k 86fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IKMWEtirigwA2tOYFoiKWZm1RW7I9T7c3yOiYlkT24nHCgiql gU1ALuuywnI8VHF2UtJ62sQ= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d344:: with SMTP id m4mr667424edr.281.1623799792558; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.26.224.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dh18sm313170edb.92.2021.06.15.16.29.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:29:49 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Yunsheng Lin Cc: Jakub Kicinski , davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andriin@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, weiwan@google.com, cong.wang@bytedance.com, ap420073@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@openeuler.org, mkl@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, jonas.bonn@netrounds.com, pabeni@redhat.com, mzhivich@akamai.com, johunt@akamai.com, albcamus@gmail.com, kehuan.feng@gmail.com, a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, atenart@kernel.org, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, hdanton@sina.com, jgross@suse.com, JKosina@suse.com, mkubecek@suse.cz, bjorn@kernel.org, alobakin@pm.me Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] Some optimization for lockless qdisc Message-ID: <20210615232949.2ntjv5kh3g7z2ua2@skbuf> References: <1622684880-39895-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20210603113548.2d71b4d3@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20210608125349.7azp7zeae3oq3izc@skbuf> <64aaa011-41a3-1e06-af02-909ff329ef7a@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64aaa011-41a3-1e06-af02-909ff329ef7a@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:31:39AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > By the way, I did not pick up your "Tested-by" from previous > RFC version because there is some change between those version > that deserves a retesting. So it would be good to have a > "Tested-by" from you after confirming no out of order happening > for this version, thanks. Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean # flexcan